LABOUR has to be more confident. It has to rewrite its narrative in Scotland.
We’ve got to acknowledge that in 1979 – although on a technicality it was defeated – we delivered a Scotland Bill.
But Labour has refused to take advantage of that legacy, and currently in Scotland we have no traction whatsoever in the constitutional debate.
That’s why I’m encouraged by the comments of some senior Labour MSPs that the party has to have a rethink about the constitutional question.
Of course there will be a second referendum. You cannot continue to fight democracy. Because if you oppose indyref2 you are opposing democracy.
For Labour that is not a vision, it’s not a strategy, it’s not a policy, it’s an acceptance of defeatism.
The only reason they might not want to have a referendum, along with the Conservatives, is that they might lose.
I think the 2021 Holyrood election will be pivotal in defining where Scots are on the issue.
My best bet is that a referendum will take place after that in either 2022 or 2023.
I don’t believe for a minute that Scotland, couldn’t be independent, of course it could. But that’s not the question we need to be asking ourselves.
The question really is, do we take a substantial number of Scottish people with the country as it moves, or is there an alternative to independence which is not being properly developed.
READ MORE: Henry McLeish: Ditch first-past-the-post MSPs at Holyrood
I fear that we’ve run out of time.
Westminster’s not interested. Boris Johnson’s not interested. Labour’s not interested.
The SNP’s position has been buoyed by their excellent results last week, but they have got to appreciate though that since 2014 very few opinion polls, out of more than 100, have given them a result of 50% or more in favour of independence.
Secondly, the country is bitterly divided at the present time. I think there’s a danger of looking into the SNP vote and thinking that everybody who votes SNP supports independence.
The SNP have been a competent government, and in many respects a good government, so therefore people vote for them for a variety of reasons.
Labour can only get back into Scottish politics if it uses the key of the constitutional question to unlock that political door.
We’re currently nowhere on the Scottish question. I have seen one person suggest that it’s nothing to do with Labour, leave it to the Tories and the SNP. That doesn’t make sense, it’s also quite dangerous.
Labour has now got to seize the opportunity to decide whether it can develop an alternative, or if it can’t, what is the next best option.
And in that sense, I have an option for them. As we move forward, we should explore further the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
What I want the Scottish party to do is test the boundaries of all the reserved issues. For example on welfare, on Europe, on immigration.
Labour has to rebuild trust. A lot of the policies in the Labour manifesto were sound, good and radical, but the fact is we’re locked out of the Scottish debate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel