Senior Labour advisers should pay the price for the party's disastrous election showing rather than junior workers, the shadow foreign secretary has said.
Responding to reports that Labour workers were angry that they faced losing their jobs while staff close to leader Jeremy Corbyn would remain in place, Emily Thornberry called for a different approach.
Asked if she was surprised that people like Corbyn's communications director, Seumas Milne, were still in place, Thornberry told ITV's Peston: "I think it is really sad to see the way in which the staff at the head office and in the leader's office are being told that many of them may be being made redundant, but as far as I understand it, the senior people within those teams are not under such a threat.
"It does seem to me that if decisions have been made, wrongly, it should be those people who pay the price and not those who were working night and day in junior positions."
Thornberry is the first MP to officially declare as a candidate to replace Corbyn as leader of Labour, and her comments come after reports that party staff expressed concern they could lose their posts while senior figures remained on the payroll.
READ MORE: Emily Thornberry enters race to be next Labour leader
A Labour spokesman said: "We don't comment on staffing matters."
In an apparent response to Thornberry's claims that she had argued against Labour-supporting Boris Johnson's push for a December election which would be fought on the Brexit issue, shadow chancellor John McDonnell said many others had wanted delay.
He Tweeted: "For historical accuracy, many of us wanted to delay election until after the Brexit legislation had been won or lost.
"This would have meant in the New Year but was impossible once SNP & Lib Dems decided to vote for one & gave Johnson the votes he needed."
Meanwhile, Wigan MP Lisa Nandy insisted she was "seriously thinking" of running to be Labour leader.
She said that Labour is facing its "last chance to save the party".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel