JK Rowling has come out in support of a researcher who was sacked after tweeting that transgender people cannot change their biological sex.
Maya Forstater lost her job in March after she posted tweets opposing government proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act to allow people to identify as the opposite sex.
Forstater, who worked as a tax expert at the Centre for Global Development, an international think tank that campaigns against poverty and inequality, took her case to an employment tribunal on the grounds that her dismissal constituted discrimination against her beliefs.
Employment judge James Tayler dismissed her claim on Wednesday, saying her views are "absolutist in her view of sex".
READ MORE: Twitter responds to JK Rowling's ridiculous attack on Yes voters
Responding to the ruling, Harry Potter author Rowling wrote on Twitter: "Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who'll have you.
"Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?"
The author, who also donated £1 million to the No campaign, added the hashtags #IStandWithMaya and #ThisIsNotADrill.
Following her tweet, Rowling's name trended on Twitter as she prompted a divided reaction from fans.
Many people claimed Rowling is a "transphobe", and the phrase "JK Rowling is a Terf" – referring to the term trans-exclusionary radical feminist - also trended on the platform.
A Terf is often used to describe feminists who express ideas that other feminists consider to be transphobic, including the belief that trans women are not women.
However, others welcomed the author's comment, with many joining her in using the hashtag #IStandWithMaya.
Forstater was accused of publishing "offensive" tweets questioning government proposals to allow people to self-identify their own gender.
JK Rowling faced a Twitter backlash
Judge Tayler ruled against Forstater in a 26-page judgment, in which he said her views did "not have the protected characteristic of philosophical belief".
He concluded Forstater was not entitled to ignore the legal rights of a transgender person and the "enormous pain that can be caused by misgendering a person".
The dispute was seen as a test case on whether a "gender critical" view - a belief that there are only two biological sexes – is a protected "philosophical belief" under the 2010 Equality Act.
Forstater had argued "framing the question of transgender inclusion as an argument that male people should be allowed into women's spaces discounts women's rights to privacy and is fundamentally illiberal (it is like forcing Jewish people to eat pork)".
Representatives for Rowling have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel