Jackson Carlaw has been forced to apologise on Twitter for falsely accusing Richard Leonard of abstaining from the Referendums (Scotland) Bill vote today.
The Bill, which seeks to lay out a framework for how future votes in Scotland are carried out, passed by 68 votes to 54 with two Labour MSPs abstaining.
In a now-deleted tweet, Carlaw claimed that Richard Leonard had been one of the members who had abstained but has since retracted the comment and issued an apology.
READ MORE: MSPs pass referendum Bill in paving the way for independence
He tweeted: "Correction & apology to Richard Leonard. He voted against the Bill today. The Labour abstentions were from Monica Lennon & Neil Findlay."
The passing of the Bill has been criticised by Unionist MSPs and celebrated by the pro-indy cohort for paving the way to another Scottish independence referendum.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said she is advocating another vote because of a "material change of circumstances", namely Scotland voting against Brexit.
Labour MSP Alex Rowley said his party could not support the Bill, adding: "The Bill we are debating today is a Bill to pave the way for an independence referendum to take place next year."
READ MORE: Ex-First Minister urges Labour to support indyref2
However, two Labour MSPs rebelled against their party and abstained. This is part of a recent trend where the General Election result cast doubt in some Labour politicians, some of whom are now crossing the line to support a second referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel