ONE of the many inventions by a Scot which is disputed by other countries is the steamboat. Google ‘‘inventor of the steamboat’’ and up will pop the name of Robert Fulton of the USA. The fact is that Fulton did create the world’s first commercial steamboat but his claim is disputed even in America, where the names of John Fitch, James Rumsey, Nathan Read and John Stevens are all quoted as steamboat inventors – and there’s no doubt they all were pioneers of the steamboat.
Yet ask which man first successfully propelled a working boat by the power of steam and the answer is William Symington of Scotland and he did it in this week in 1789.
The English engineer Jonathan Hulls had lodged a patent for a steam-powered vessel as early as 1737, but he never actually built one or demonstrated it in the flesh, so to speak.
He called it a ‘‘Machine for carrying vessels and ships out of, or into, any Harbour, Port or River against Wind or Tide or in a Calm’’ and declared he had been granted Letters Patent by King George II entitling him to benefit from his invention for a period of 14 years.
READ MORE: Back in the day: How Scots have interfered with England’s history
Hulls had no support for building his invention and he is said to have died in poverty long before James Watt’s development of a steam engine that could be adapted for use on a boat.
Born in Leadhills, now in South Lanarkshire, in 1764, Symington’s father was a mechanical engineer at the local mines. They were “respectable but not wealthy” in Symington’s own words.
He was well-educated and his parents wanted William to enter the Kirk ministry, but his brother George was already involved in making steam engines and William followed in his footsteps.
Before he was even 20, Symington had conceived of applying steam power to road carriages and even demonstrated a working model.
Yet nothing came of it except for a recommendation from a local mine manager, Gilbert Meason, that he should go to Edinburgh University and study science. Symington did so but returned to help George complete the steam engine at Wanlockhead mine, only the second such engine in
Scotland and built to the design of James Watt himself.
James Watt
Symington realised that Watt’s engine could be improved and he patented developments of the engine, including one which could be laid horizontally which in turn got him to thinking about practical usage.
His road carriage experiment having gone nowhere, Symington created an engine to power a boat and, unlike Hulls, he built one, with support from banker Patrick Miller. The fear was that the engine would set fire to a boat, but in October 1788, his steam-powered paddle-driven adapted pleasure boat was demonstrated on Dalswinton Loch near Dumfries, and while there were arguments as to how fast it went, at least the boat did not catch fire.
READ MORE: Scotland Back in the Day: Flodden, the worst day in Scottish history
Symington and Miller could see the possibilities of steam power in boats and the latter – or rather his manager John Taylor – would later claim they had invented the concept.
Unfortunately for them the Scots Magazine of November 1788 contained a comprehensive account of the experiments and credited Symington with the invention – the man himself was content to be known as a pioneer in the field of steam navigation, the words that were eventually carved on his memorial in Leadhills. Later court cases and even scrutiny in Parliament would confirm Symington’s case.
The big step forward took place in December, 1789. Symington fitted a steam engine to a 60ft-long paddle boat on the Forth and Clyde Canal and it made its maiden voyage on December 2, though the trip had to be abandoned as the paddles broke into pieces.
Nothing daunted, Symington fitted stronger paddles and 230 years ago this week on December 26 and 27, 1789, the boat made a lengthy voyage on the Canal, possibly reaching the unheard-of speed of 6mph.
This was the world’s first practical demonstration of a working steamboat.
Unfortunately the canal banks were damaged and Miller was also concerned about the rising costs so development work stopped and Symington went off to install steam engines, mostly for water extraction, in more than 30 mines across Scotland and became a consultant to the Carron Iron Works near Falkirk.
One man had not forgotten about Symington’s work and he just happened to be one of the most powerful men in Scotland – Thomas, Lord Dundas, who was governor of the Forth and Clyde Canal company and had an interest in canals in England.
Dundas knew that a Captain John Schank had failed in an attempt to make a steamboat for the Bridgewater Canal, but he proposed putting Symington’s new engine into a Schank boat and in 1801 it was successfully trailed on the River Carron.
Symington then came up with a design for what was in effect a steam-powered tug which was named the Charlotte Dundas after one of his patron’s daughters. On January 4, 1803, the Charlotte Dundas had her maiden voyage along the Canal, and later she towed two boats totalling 70 tons in record time.
Yet if anything she was too fast and the Canal’s directors pulled the plug after seeing erosion of the banks.
The Charlotte Dundas was decommissioned and allowed to rot away, while Symington had to watch on as Robert Fulton in the USA and Henry Bell on the Clyde made the steamboat developments that left him far behind. He died in 1831 in London and his achievements were only acknowledged much later.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here