IAN Murray, Labour’s only remaining MP in Scotland, is lining up to stand for the deputy leadership of the UK party.
With the issue of Scotland’s future moving up the political agenda, it was reported yesterday that he regards a deputy leadership challenge as a chance to raise the profile of Scottish issues within Labour and widen the debate about the party’s direction.
Murray first won his Edinburgh South seat in 2010 and is the only Labour MP left in Scotland after a disastrous General Election result for the party both north and south of the Border.
Following his re-election with a huge 11,000-plus majority, Murray pinned much of the blame for Labour’s catastrophic defeat on Jeremy Corbyn.
Last week, he was passed over by Corbyn, who chose English MP Tony Lloyd to be his shadow Scottish secretary instead.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour are beginning to accept the idea of independence
READ MORE: Labour MPs urged to 'refuse to accept' Rebecca Long-Bailey as leader
Corbyn is to stand down when a new leader of UK Labour is elected early next year. His former deputy Tom Watson quit his position in November and did not fight the General Election. The move followed a series of clashes with Corbyn on anti-Semitism, Brexit and the party’s direction.
Richard Leonard, the Scottish Labour leader, is expected to stay on until at least the 2021 Holyrood election, but there is a vacancy for his deputy after Lesley Laird lost her Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath seat on December 12.
Reports yesterday suggested Dumbarton MSP Jackie Baillie was coming under pressure from MSPs and party members to throw her hat into the ring.
One leading supporter of Baillie told the Sunday Times: “The time for factions in the party is over and we need to include all the talents, and there needs to be balance in the leadership if we want to win again.”
Baillie’s Holyrood colleague Pauline McNeill is also understood to be considering standing for the deputy post.
Scottish Labour last week announced a review into its election rout that will include developing a “clear, constitutional offer” to the nation. The move came as senior figures questioned the party’s opposition to indyref2.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel