I WAS the last journalist to speak to the literary legend, Alasdair Gray. It was the day of the General Election, and I had arrived at Alasdair’s house after calling his landline, which he promptly picked up, to ask if I could speak to him following his most recent accolade. At 84 (he turned 85 last week) Alasdair had just been awarded a lifetime achievement award for his contribution to Scottish literature this week by the Saltire Society.
I made the case to speak to Alasdair personally, because I suspected that the chance might not arise again. Alasdair passed away yesterday morning at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. His health was ailing, and he had used a wheelchair since a fall in his home in 2015. His wife, Morag, had passed some years before.
“I feel very pleased about the award,” Gray told me. “Because I am not likely to be writing another novel, or work of fiction, or even play.”
READ MORE: 'A true original': Scots pay tribute to Alasdair Gray
READ MORE: Alasdair Gray's final interview: 'I hope I’ve learned how to be an artist'
READ MORE: Alasdair Gray's front page which galvanised the Yes movement
READ MORE: Gentle, generous, giving: A tribute to Alasdair Gray
What struck me during our conversations was the sheer amount of work that he had already completed, and what he still had to do. Surrounding the walls, floors and chairs were many, many pictures – some recognizable, from the paintings I had seen in galleries or adorning the front of his books, and others completely new. Line drawings and sketches, as well as big framed pieces. We went from room to room, me pushing him on his wheelchair, and he talked me through the various artefacts, relics of his life’s work.
I had first come across his work through my sister, who brought home from school her teacher’s copy of Lanark. And then while studying for an English degree in St Andrews – it was not required reading, despite being a landmark of Scottish contemporary literature.
Again, his name resurfaced whilst I studied Irish writing at Trinity College, Dublin, amidst comparisons to another giant of literary modernism – James Joyce.
It was surreal to sit in the living room of a living genius and ask him personally what he thought of such a comparison. “I think the comparison is flattering, but I don’t see it,” he said. “I like Joyce very much. I can’t say that I’ve read Finnegans Wake steadily through, though I dip into it from time to time and in short doses it amuses me greatly.”
It was apparent from his home how much Joyce had inspired him. I counted multiple copies of his works on shelves, and Alasdair told me that he initially wrote the Thaw section of Lanark intending it to be: “A portrait of the artist as a young Glaswegian and based on me.” In the hours that I spent with Alasdair, we looked at the pictures from his biography, A Life in Pictures. He had depicted a plethora of Glasgow characters, and complimented them with words.
As a journalist with a literary background, it was the words that have always attracted me to his work and he certainly has a way with them. He was shy, and modest: he seemed unaware how much his work meant to people in Glasgow. “I am just a rather haggard looking artist, surrounded by paintings which are rather haggard looking self-portraits stacked against the walls of his studio, saying, ‘how wonderful it must be to sit here surrounded by all my lovely pictures?’ “Is it not wonderful?” I asked him.
“It is more wonderful when other people acquire them, or if a public gallery has them and hangs them up. I’d prefer that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel