A SOCIALIST and a staunch supporter of Scottish independence, Alasdair Gray formed his beliefs at an early age.
Born in Riddrie, in the East End of Glasgow, his father was a factory worker but had been wounded in the First World War. Gray would later speak out against militarism, and was vehemently opposed to nuclear weapons.
As he became more well-known for both his writing and his idiosyncratic artwork, he began to declare publicly his support for Scottish independence.
READ MORE: Renowned artist and author Alasdair Gray dies aged 85
In 1992, he published a short polemic before the General Election called Why Scots Should Rule Scotland. He described himself as a civic nationalist, explaining that neither the title nor his views were xenophobic.
“The title of this book may sound threatening to those who live in Scotland but were born and educated elsewhere, so I had better explain that by Scots I mean everyone in Scotland who is eligible to vote,” he said.
This point was not always understood and at times seemed to be deliberately misconstrued by the London-based press, who took umbrage in particular at an essay written by Gray in 2012 where he characterised English people working in Scotland as either long-term “settlers” or short-term “colonists”. Gray actually approved of the former but was pilloried as anti-English and against English immigration into Scotland, views which he always denied, pointing out that many of his best friends were English.
For Gray, devolution was never enough as he believed those who lived in Scotland would not be able to create a socialist country while remaining tied to England. Labour’s ascent to power in 1997 did not impress him one iota and although he abhorred most of the views of the erstwhile Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, he did agree with her on one point – that Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair was her greatest achievement.
At the turn of the century he nailed his colours firmly to the independence mast by standing as a candidate of the Glasgow University Scottish Nationalist Association for the job of rector of the university. He didn’t win, being narrowly beaten by Still Game’s Greg Hemphill, but he continued to write and argue in favour of Scottish independence.
In 2014, before the Scottish independence referendum, he published Independence: An Argument for Home Rule. In it he argued that a truly independent Scotland would only ever exist when people in every home, school, croft, farm, workshop, factory, island, glen, town and city feel that they too were at the centre of the world.
In Gray’s independent Scotland there is no anti-Scottish BBC, no Nato membership, no nuclear weapons or militarism and state ownership is key.
He posed the question of whether widespread social welfare is more feasible in small nations such as Norway and New Zealand than in larger ones like Britain and the US.
READ MORE: Twitter tributes paid to Alasdair Gray after dying at 85
Gray also attempted to conjure a vision of how a truly independent Scottish Parliament would benefit Scots and argued that democracy would only succeed when every person believed that their vote would make a difference. He described the many differences between Scotland and England and attempted to show Scotland’s relevance to the rest of the world.
The book set out a short history of Britain, demonstrating that Westminster-based politicians and their branch office acolytes in Scotland have long spread fear to turn Scots against home rule. This has been going on since the creation of the Union, according to Gray, and Scots need to cast off their chains and become independent.
“If Scotland could tax its offshore oil companies and people here were not taxed to keep military forces and nuclear weapons… then a Scottish Government chosen by folk living here could make this a more decent country,” he said.
“We do not want an independent Scotland because we dislike the English, but because we want separation from that Union of financial, military and monarchic establishments calling itself Great Britain.”
When the new Scottish Parliament was being built, a quotation frequently used by Gray was carved into the Canongate Wall. He attributed the quote “work as if you live in the early days of a better nation” to Canadian author Dennis Lee but it caught the imagination of independence supporters across Scotland and has inspired many, particularly in the run-up to the independence referendum of 2014.
READ MORE: Alasdair Gray: The closest Scotland had to our own Leonardo da Vinci
In his last few years, Gray became disappointed with the performance of the devolved Scottish Government which he felt was not doing enough to mitigate the policies of austerity propagated by the Tories – aided initially by the LibDems – in Westminster.
He was also uneasy about what he felt was the SNP’s increasing tendency towards centralisation. A staunch advocate of what he believed are the central pillars of Scottish culture – Scots law, the egalitarian nature of the Scottish Kirk and the tradition of aspiration in Scottish education – he felt that they were being undermined by recent SNP policies. It seemed to him that Scottish education was being “dumbed down”, while the distinctiveness of Scots law was in danger of being eroded. He was particularly critical of attempts to remove the principle of corroboration in Scots law, which he said would make it more like English law, and was also impatient with policies that increased bureaucracy. In particular he was frustrated about the failure to counteract UK militarism.
One of his last interviews was given in the summer when he criticised the Scottish Government for being as Tory as Westminster.
However he also hoped that once Scotland was an independent nation again “we will argue, quarrel and compromise about important matters”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here