IAN Blackford has called for a “radical shake up” at the BBC accusing the corporation of a “glaringly obvious” disregard for devolution and “systematically” omitting Scotland and the SNP from stories.
The MP said his party “often had to challenge” the broadcaster during the campaign for last month’s General Election.
The BBC yesterday insisted its coverage in the run up to the December 12 vote had been “fair and proportionate”.
Blackford’s comments came in the wake of a row sparked by an SNP official’s demand to broadcasters to “rigorously scrutinise” the “undemocratic and untenable assertion” by the Tories that the SNP did not have a mandate for a second referendum.
John Toner, Scottish officer for the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), hit out at the move, telling The Times: “Professional journalists do not need guidance from any political party on how to do their jobs.”
READ MORE: SNP say indyref2020 is still on – despite MP’s claim it’s unlikely
He added: “How interviews are handled is a matter for the journalist and his/her editor. The claims of all political parties should be rigorously scrutinised, and it is not acceptable for one party to try to influence the degree to which other parties and scrutinised.”
But Blackford said the SNP were forced to make near daily challenges to the BBC during the election regulated period between November 6 and December 12.
He also criticised BBC promise to give the SNP and the LibDems “level pegging” when it comes to air time.
The party’s Westminster chief said the SNP had been the “third-largest party at Westminster since 2015, with substantially greater numbers of MPs than the LibDems in the previous three elections.”
He added: “In this latest Westminster election we won a mandate from the people of Scotland to hold a fresh referendum on Scotland becoming an independent country. The LibDems during the same period, in reality, remain a minority party who lack any real relevance.”
Despite that, Blackford says, media monitoring of BBC’s main news bulletins at 6pm and 10pm show “the LibDems appeared on more items and for considerably longer periods than the SNP did during the regulated period.”
READ MORE: If Maitlis can’t see BBC’s bias then she’s part of the problem
He added that for the public service broadcaster “to survive” it needs to “up its game and aim to match the complex and diverse needs of its audience. It needs a radical shake up.”
Ofcom’s rules for election coverage calls for political parties to be given “appropriate levels of coverage” on TV and radio.
That appropriate level, it says, should be decided by looking at past and current electoral support.
A BBC spokesperson said: “Our aim throughout the election was to be on the side of the audience who came to us in their millions and we delivered our most ambitious coverage whilst ensuring it was fair and proportionate over the course of the campaign.
“Among multiple appearances on BBC News, we were the only broadcaster to offer the SNP to take part in a Question Time style debate alongside the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats.
READ MORE: People read conspiracies into 'cock-ups' at BBC, Maitlis claims
“Nicola Sturgeon was also interviewed by Andrew Neil, on BBC Breakfast and took questions from callers on BBC Radio 5 Live.”
The BBC were criticised for failing to secure an interview with Boris Johnson for Andrew Neil, despite every other major party leader in the UK being subject to a grilling from the corporation’s toughest interviewer.
Following the election, Labour also complained, saying the BBC was effectively “complicit in giving the Conservative Party an unfair electoral advantage”.
The host of the BBC’s election night coverage, Huw Edwards, hit out at the “toxic” criticism of journalists by the parties and their supporters.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel