LIBYA’s House of Representatives have voted to cancel an agreement between the north African nation and Turkey.
The unanimous vote put an end to an agreement between prime minister Fayez Sarraj and the Turkish government which would have resulted in the deployment of Turkish troops to the country.
Last week, Sarraj signed two agreements with Turkey. One agreement allowed the nation to send troops to Libya to support the UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA) in Tripoli, and another which specified maritime borders.
Earlier last year, a renegade former Gaddafi general and CIA asset named Khalifa Haftar launched an attack on the internationally recognised GNA.
In doing so, Haftar compromised a UN-brokered peace process that seemed to be on the brink of success.
Currently the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, France and Russia are supporting Haftar. So are Russian mercenaries from the likes of the Kremlin-linked Wagner Group and African mercenaries from Sudan and Chad. Meanwhile Turkey, Qatar, Italy and other European countries are supporting the GNA.
The emergency vote, held yesterday by the parliament in Tobruk – where the House of Representatives is based – also agreed that all those who were responsible for the agreement with Turkey would be referred to prosecutors for high treason.
The parliament is one of three powers struggling for control alongside the GNA and Hafta’s Libyan National Army.
READ MORE: Google and tech giants to fight cobalt child labour case
Led by speaker Aguila Saleh, it declared the memorandum illegal since it did not pass parliamentary assent.
Saleh described the agreement as a “flagrant violation of international law”.
Despite global criticism, on Thursday, Turkey’s parliament gave its president – Recep Tayyip Erdogan – a year to figure out what military support to provide to the GNA, which has been under a sustained attack from Haftar’s forces since April.
The violence has displaced thousands of people and trapped hundreds of migrants and refugees in detention centres run by militias or human traffickers. This continues on from the conflict in the country during the reign and eventual fall of dictator Muammar Gaddafi in Autumn 2011.
Haftar currently holds Libyan territories in the east of the country, and his intention is to “free” Tripoli from militant groups and the GNA. Following the news of the agreement to deploy Turkish troops, Haftar called “men and women, soldiers and civilians” to take up arms and “defend our land and our honour”.
In a televised broadcast on Friday, he said: “We accept the challenge and declare jihad and a call to arms.”
READ MORE: Ex-Nissan boss lays low in Lebanon after daring Japan escape
Moussa Faki Mahamat, the chair of the African Union Commission, voiced grave concern over potential international “interference” in Libya.
Faki said: “The various threats of political and military interference in the internal affairs of the country increase the risk of a confrontation whose motives have nothing to do with the fundamental interests of the Libyan people and their aspirations for freedom, peace, democracy and development.”
He urged African countries to find a peaceful solution to the worsening crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel