TRANSPORT officials have been asked to look at various options for a bridge linking Scotland to Northern Ireland, it has been confirmed in the Lords.
Transport minister Baroness Vere of Norbiton said there was even talk of a potential tunnel, now costs had come down.
But she cautioned peers at question time not to hold their breath about any quick outcome to the investigations.
In January 2018, The National exclusively revealed in an interview with a leading architect that a bridge between the countries could create a "Celtic powerhouse".
Professor Alan Dunlop, from the school of architecture at Liverpool University, said a bridge would boost the Scottish and Irish economies and help solve any longer-term disputes over the re-emergence of an Irish border post-Brexit
READ MORE: Bridge from Scotland to Ireland could create 'Celtic powerhouse'
Boris Johnson raised the possibility of building a bridge last month, saying it was a very interesting idea.
Engineering experts poured cold water on the proposal, warning it was potentially fraught with problems and costs could spiral.
Initial estimates put the cost of such a project at around £15 billion although the Institution of Civil Engineers suggested on Monday a tunnel under the Irish Sea would be a more practical solution.
The issue was raised at Lords question time by Labour former minister Lord Foulkes of Cumnock as peers pressed the minister over repairs to London's Hammersmith Bridge.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon urged to support Northern Ireland bridge review
Lord Foulkes said: "During the general election Boris Johnson pledged to consider building a bridge from Northern Ireland to Scotland even though there are hundreds of tons of explosives in Beaufort's Dyke, which were put there supposedly because it's a safe place to put them.
"If the Government can't keep Hammersmith Bridge open how on earth are they going to manage to do that?" he demanded, to laughter.
"Is this going to go ahead?"
Lady Vere replied: "You're quite right.
"We have asked officials to look at various options for bridges which would strengthen our union.
"I understand there is some talk of a potential tunnel, now that tunnelling costs are much cheaper than they used to be.
"I will say watch this space but perhaps don't hold your breath."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel