IRAN has struck back at the United States for killing a top Revolutionary Guard commander, firing ballistic missiles at two military bases in Iraq that house American troops.
The attack was a major escalation between the two long-time foes and Iran's most direct assault on America since the 1979 seizing of the US embassy in Tehran.
Iranian state TV said it was in revenge for the US killing of General Qassem Soleimani, whose death last week in an American drone strike near Baghdad prompted angry calls to avenge his killing.
US and Iraqi officials said there were no immediate reports of casualties, though buildings were still being searched. The Iraqi government later confirmed there were no casualties among Iraqi forces.
A presenter on Iranian state television later claimed, without offering evidence, that the strikes killed "at least 80 terrorist US soldiers" and also damaged helicopters, drones and other equipment at the Ain al-Asad air base.
READ MORE: Iran: 176 people killed in Ukraine Boeing plane crash near Tehran
READ MORE: These are the profound implications of the killing of Qasem Soleimani
The strikes, which came as Iran buried Gen Soleimani, raised fears that the two foes were closer to war. But there were some indications that there would not be further retaliation on either side, at least in the short term.
US president Donald Trump tweeted "All is well!" shortly after the missile attacks, adding "So far, so good" regarding casualties.
Moments earlier, Iran's foreign minister tweeted that Tehran had taken and "concluded proportionate measures in self-defence", adding that Tehran did "not seek escalation" but would defend itself against further aggression.
In Tehran, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called the missile strike on the US bases in Iraq a "slap in the face" of the Americans, adding that military retaliation is not sufficient.
"The corrupt presence of the US in the region should come to end," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel