SCOTTISH Secretary Alister Jack confirmed the UK Government has received Nicola Sturgeon's request for indyref2 during a stumbling turn at the despatch box for Scottish Questions.
However, Jack repeatedly rejected arguments for a fresh plebiscite in the Commons session.
Asked if Downing Street has received a request for a Section 30 Order, the Scottish Secretary said: “The Prime Minister has received the First Minister’s correspondence which contains the Scottish Government’s publication and will respond in due course.”
But Jack claimed that the SNP’s vote share in the December General Election is not sufficient to fuel calls for a second referendum.
Responding to a question from the SNP’s Chris Law, the Tory said: “Forty-five per cent of Scots voted for the SNP in the 2019 election and 45% of Scots voted for independence in 2014. The numbers simply haven’t changed.”
READ MORE: Ian Blackford puts SNP on indyref2 footing with new-look team
Rookie MP Amy Callaghan pointed out the “blinding hypocrisy” underpinning the Tory argument against indyref2.
She said: “This Tory government is claiming that its 43% of the vote in the last General Election provides it with an overwhelming mandate to implement Brexit.
“Can the Secretary of State therefore explain the absolute blinding contradiction of his own position when he says the 45% vote for the SNP, providing 80% of Scottish seats in this very House, doesn’t equate to a mandate for the people of Scotland to choose our own future?”
Jack’s stumbling reply seemed to include a bizarre claim that Scots had voted to leave the European Union.
He said: “It was a referendum three years ago. We, we are speaking for the majority of Scots. The majority of Scots voted … voted to remain … the majority voted sorry to leave in 2016, to leave the European Union. We are absolutely respecting that decision, whereas the SNP are not respecting it and are wanting to the tear up the United Kingdom.”
READ MORE: SNP to table amendments to Withdrawal Bill to block Tory power grab
Airdrie and Shotts MP Neil Gray then asked what the UK Government’s “democratic case” was for “denying the people of Scotland their right to choose our future”.
He said: "His party enjoys 43% of the vote to deliver Brexit and yet denies the SNP its right to give the people of Scotland its say with the 45% of the vote in Scotland that we have secured."
The Scottish Secretary replied: "The First Minister has asked for the right to set referendums in the future, to decide the context of those.
"We are very clear about this. Constitutional matters are reserved and it would be completely wrong for us to hands those powers over to the Scottish Parliament because we would end up in a series of never-endums."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel