LABOUR leadership contender Rebecca Long-Bailey has made light of a false report that she is married to a multi-millionaire.
The shadow business secretary reacted with amusement after the Guido Fawkes political website mixed up her husband with a man who has the same name and a major shareholding in a chemical company. Long-Bailey has made much play of her humble beginnings in the race to replace Jeremy Corbyn, stressing her past experiences such as working in a pawn shop and call centres before becoming a lawyer.
The Salford and Eccles MP, 40, has positioned herself as the most socialist of the six contenders so far declared for the contest. Long-Bailey has insisted she is best placed to reconnect with working class voters who deserted the party in large numbers at the December General Election.
The website admitted it had got things wrong and apologised for the mistake. It tweeted: “Apologies, we screwed up. We got the wrong Bailey. Two Steve Baileys working in the chemical industry. A lesson to us to never follow up leads from Wikipedia.”
Meanwhile, Keir Starmer has secured the backing of enough Labour MPs to enter the second stage of the Labour leadership contest.
Candidates need nominations from 10% of Labour MPs and MEPs – which total 212, making the required threshold 22.
The latest figures show the shadow Brexit secretary has 26 nominations, placing him well ahead of his main rival, Long-Bailey, who is on nine so far. He was given the added boost of being backed by Unison, the country’s largest union, in a move that means Starmer is almost certain to get his name onto the ballot paper.
The union also threw its support behind deputy leadership candidate and shadow education secretary Angela Rayner.
According to figures published yesterday, backbencher Jess Phillips has seven nominations, while Wigan MP Lisa Nandy has six. Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry has two nominations so far, and Clive Lewis has none.
Nominations from MPs and MEPs close on Monday, January 13. Candidates who receive enough nominations will then enter phase two of the contest, where they have to secure the backing of 5% of constituency Labour branches or at least three affiliate groups, two of which must be maid up of trade unions, to get onto the final ballot paper and face election by the membership.
Unison’s backing of Starmer provides him with further momentum at the start of the campaign.
The decision was taken by the union’s Labour Link committee, which is made up entirely of Labour members.
General secretary Dave Prentis said: “This is a pivotal time for Labour.
“We believe – if elected by the membership – Keir Starmer would be a leader to bring the party together and win back the trust of the thousands of voters who deserted Labour last month.
“Keir has a clear vision to get Labour back to the winning ways of the past.
“He is best placed to take on Boris Johnson, hold his Government to account and ensure Labour can return to power and once more change working people’s lives for the better.”
Starmer said he was “honoured” to receive the union’s backing, adding: “I want to lead a Labour Party that will stand side-by-side with trade unionists. United we can rebuild our party, take the fight to the Tories and win.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel