MICHAEL Russell has said that it is "very difficult" for the the SNP and the Tory Government to make progress on anything else until the indyref2 issue is resolved.
The Scottish Constitutional Relations Secretary spoke out after Scottish Secretary Alister Jack dismissed claims by SNP ministers that they have secured a mandate for another referendum.
At talks in London, Russell said the party had gained the right for fresh vote after winning 47 of the 59 Scottish seats in last month's General Election.
But Jack said the SNP's share of the popular vote was no higher than it was at the time of the 2014 independence referendum.
"We believe that the 45% of the people who voted for the SNP was a similar number who voted for independence in 2014," he told reporters following the meeting.
"Our view is that 55% of Scotland voted for Unionist parties and therefore they don't have a mandate."
READ MORE: Alister Jack's 'blinding hypocrisy' exposed at Scottish Questions
Jack said the UK Government would be making a "measured and considered" response to a formal request by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to hold a referendum under section 30 of the Scotland Act.
He claimed it was right the power to consent to a referendum remained at Westminster, otherwise Scotland would face a series of "never-endums" as the SNP sought the result it wanted.
"Once they could do that, they could just keep asking and create constitutional uncertainty, it would create economic uncertainty. It is damaging to jobs, damaging to taxation," he said.
The clash came at the first meeting of the Joint Ministerial Council (JMC) on EU negotiations since the general election.
It was attended by representatives of the UK and Scottish Governments, as well as the Welsh administration.
Following the talks, Russell said they could not make progress on other issues until the referendum issue was resolved.
"We have a mandate to have a referendum in Scotland – there is no doubt about that," he told reporters.
"I accept that the UK Government has a mandate to leave the EU. They have to accept our mandate.
"Until that issue is resolved it is very difficult to make progress on anything else. It will colour everything in this process from now on."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel