PEERS have been told to listen to the will of the country and back legislation paving the way for Brexit on January 31 after MPs voted to pass the measure.
Boris Johnson’s European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 99 as the Prime Minister was able to rely on the ranks of new Tory MPs that entered Parliament at the General Election.
But the legislation now heads to the upper chamber, where there is no Government majority and where peers repeatedly dealt blows to Theresa May’s administration.
In a sign of the battles that are expected to start on Monday, the Liberal Democrats – who have 94 peers – promised they would “continue to fight to hold the Government to account”.
Downing Street urged the unelected House to take heed of the December general election result which delivered Mr Johnson’s 80-seat Commons majority.
“The country did deliver a very clear message that they want Brexit to be resolved,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.
Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay said he anticipated “constructive scrutiny” from peers but “I have no doubt that their Lordships will have heard the resounding message from the British people on December 12”.
“And they will have seen the clear will of this House.”
The legislation’s passage through the Commons is in contrast to the torment endured by May as she repeatedly tried and failed to get a Brexit deal through Parliament.
Liberal Democrat Brexit spokesman Alistair Carmichael said the legislation would “slash the rights of future generations to live and work” in the EU.
“As this damaging Bill progresses through Parliament, the Liberal Democrats will continue to fight to hold the Government to account and to secure the rights that the Tories are determined to erase,” he said.
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford said Brexit would cause a constitutional crisis for the United Kingdom.
“Today will go down as the final nail in the coffin for this broken union – as Scotland faces being dragged out of the EU against our will by an extreme Tory government with no mandate here,” he said.
MPs have voted for the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill at third reading, by 330 votes to 231.
— UK House of Commons (@HouseofCommons) January 9, 2020
This now moves the Bill on to the House of Lords to be scrutinised next week.
The legislation allows the UK to leave the EU with a deal on January 31, setting up the next stage of the process as the two sides attempt to thrash out a trade deal.
Downing Street stressed it was ready to begin negotiations on February 1.
But Brussels’ chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier insisted that Britain’s goal to have a full free trade deal by the end of the year was unrealistic.
“We cannot expect to agree on every aspect of this new partnership,” Barnier said, adding “we are ready to do our best in the 11 months”.
Time is short. 3 priorities stand out: building new channels of cooperation; a strong security partnership; a level playing field in our future economic relations w/ #UK
— Michel Barnier (@MichelBarnier) January 9, 2020
Never will it be the 🇪🇺 that fails on common ambition.
My speech @EC_StockholmRep: https://t.co/4X1WhjpwYR pic.twitter.com/ZGRxcdUZ2s
He warned the UK’s market access to the EU could be limited unless it agreed to conditions on state subsidies.
“If the UK wants an open link with us for the products – zero tariffs, zero quotas – we need to be careful about zero dumping at the same time,” Mr Barnier told a conference in Stockholm.
“I hope that this point is and will be correctly understood by everybody. We will ask necessarily certain conditions on state aid policy in the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel