A TRADE union which controversially backed a No vote in 2014 must consult its members before deciding its policy ahead of a second independence referendum, according to a leading activist.
Richie Venton, an Usdaw shop steward and a member of the union’s UK-wide Executive Council, criticised the shopworkers’ union for what he described as a “lack of proper consultation or debate” before it supported Better Together in 2014.
He said: “In the last Scottish independence referendum, Usdaw raced with Aslef and the GMB unions to be the first to affiliate to the anti-independence Better Together campaign, which was funded by the Tories and fronted by Labour’s Alistair Darling.
READ MORE: ‘Unions must champion Scotland’s right to decide future’
“That decision was made by the then Usdaw general secretary, with no proper consultation or debate amongst Scottish union members. Literally the only two-sided debate held in the whole of Scotland was the one I organised in my own workplace union members’ meeting, where I debated with the Usdaw Scottish Officer, with 83% of the members present voting Yes at the end, the rest undecided and not one single vote cast for No.
“When the general secretary sent every Scottish Usdaw member a letter and an email urging us to vote No to independence, it caused ructions and resignations from the union. Even many members who were against independence were furious at the lack of democracy involved.”
He went on to urge the union not to proceed in that way ahead of a possible new vote.
“We have not yet discussed the issue on our current executive council (EC), so I don’t pretend to speak on behalf of the whole EC.
“But I strongly share the opinion of many, many Usdaw members that there must be no repeat of that divisive, destructive exercise, next time round. As a minimum first step, I think the union should defend the right of the Scottish people to decide their own future,” he said.
“I have consistently argued that instead of calling on members to vote No, the union leadership should actively encourage and organise democratic debates, at workplaces, union branches and Scottish Conference, with equal time and space for speakers and writers for and against Scottish independence to ensure an informed membership cast their votes in a second referendum.”
READ MORE: FMQs protesters urge Nicola Sturgeon to do more on climate
He added: “I for one would be arguing for self-government as a means to an end. To vastly boost pay in this notoriously low-paid sector; meet our union’s key demand for a guaranteed minimum 16-hour-week contract for every worker who wants one; and a charter of workers’ rights, instead of the repressive anti-union laws suffered in Tory (and New Labour) Britain.
“There’s a far more realistic chance of achieving these union aims in a Scotland with full power over employment rights and the minimum wage, than of dreaming about persuading Boris Johnson to suddenly become the workers’ friend.”
Usdaw backed a No vote at its Scottish conference in Dundee after inviting Better Together chairman Alistair Darling to address members. Nobody from the Yes campaign was invited.
The No position of the Communication Workers Union was reached after a motion was drafted by its UK executive. Scotland’s largest trade unions Unison and Unite remained neutral.
Venton, who is also a senior activist in the Scottish Socialist Party, spoke out after Grahame Smith, the general secretary, called for Scottish Labour to back a second independence vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel