HERE’S a thought to cheer you all up – the Johnson Government could be facing some further legal defeats this year over their arrogance, fantasy timescales and lack of detail on delivering Brexit.
News this week from the Institute for Government reveals that Westminster could face legal action from the European Commission if they fail to deliver the necessary computer systems in order to implement the Northern Ireland Protocol. The protocol involves highly complex customs arrangements and regulatory and customs checks between the North and the rest of the UK. This could take up to five years to get up and running, making Johnson’s 11-month target unrealistic and foolhardy. In the report it states that “failure to comply with the Withdrawal Agreement could see the European Commission begin infringement proceedings and the UK ending up at the European Court of Justice”. Oh dearie, dearie me.
Of course, there is also the little matter of none of the political parties in Northern Ireland supporting the Withdrawal Agreement in the first place; they all know it’s going to be a practical nightmare. Johnson has been busy this week reassuring the new power-sharing executive at Stormont that there will be no checks on goods coming across the sea, no tariffs, no nothings. It remains to be seen whether the canny MLAs are falling for Johnson’s charm offensive. Because with no practical plans in place and no trade deal secured with the EU, it looks like the PM’s great Brexit recipe is more spatchcock than “oven ready”.
READ MORE: Labour in disarray over ‘demagogue’ Boris Johnson’s letter
On top of that, the Irish Government have said they are under no pressure to comply with Johnson’s timetable to make sure everything is done and dusted by the end of 2020, as Johnson’s laughable redline on Brexit would suggest. We already know how little Phil Hogan, the EU Commissioner, thinks about Johnson’s self-imposed legal straightjacket to get Brexit trade deals completed by December this year with no extension of the transition period under any circumstances. The hard truth is that no-one but no-one in the EU is taking his bluster and bombast seriously. And the Institute for Government agrees, reporting that the Government’s short timeline for sorting out the border issue is “undeliverable”.
In Scotland, we’re watching Northern Ireland from the distance of having absolutely no say in Brexit matters, indeed on any matter come to that. This report from the Institute for Government also points out how much the devolved administrations have been marginalised during this whole Brexit bourach. Northern Ireland is currently centre stage now that Brexit is under way, but, with the geographical bonus of being attached to a happy EU member state, it is far further up the food chain when it comes to strength of position in determining its European future. Scotland and Wales in contrast have been utterly silenced and ignored. It’s almost like we’re invisible … now Scotland’s demand for a second independence referendum is also being snubbed, regardless of the overwhelming democratic case of a pro-Remain Scotland’s right to choose our own nation’s future.
So what’s to be done? I would like to think that these prevailing circumstances were anticipated when the SNP leadership instructed its MPs to help force the Christmas election. A Corbyn minority administration hanging by a Scottish rope was an attractive but unlikely scenario as an electoral outcome. Far more likely was a Johnson majority at Westminster facing an SNP majority in Scotland – the ultimate battle of the mandates, which we have now.
The hard-line veto contained in Johnson’s letter yesterday is insulting, disgraceful and undemocratic. But it is not in any sense a surprise from a Prime Minister whose ego has been even further inflated by a Commons majority the size of Big Ben.
If the Scottish Government have a plan to implement their mandate then they should exercise it now, if only to put Alister Jack back in his box. If not then they should develop one quickly, perhaps even open up strategy to debate and discussion, before the patience of our superb independence activists is exhausted. There is no need for pessimism about the prospects for success. The party with the plan will win through.
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Claim SNP vowed indyref was 'once in a lifetime' opportunity
The UK Government are tying themselves up in knots over Brexit and merely pretending to get it done. Meanwhile the EU maintains the upper hand in securing future trade deals and working to their own more realistic timeline. As this desultory debate continues, Scotland has an important job to do.
We need to be “oven ready” while Johnson is still out getting in the messages. How do we do this? There are four theatres of political dispute through which Scotland’s case can be progressed – parliamentary pressure, popular mobilisation, international lobbying and carefully directed legal action. In all of these, and this is important, we must banish political tribalism. As we progress the political mandate for action we should not be interested in sides within Scotland, but encompass all those prepared to take Scotland’s side. We need to be primed and ready for our new future so that when the time comes, we can grasp it firmly in our hands and know we are on a new path together, a shared vision. There is no gainsaying self-determination and no stopping democracy.
As a life-long campaigner for Scotland’s rights as a nation once said: “What do we do when we are told ‘we say no and we are the state’. We should reply ‘we say yes and we are the people’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel