TAX plans outlined by Scottish Conservative leadership candidate Jackson Carlaw could cost Scotland £270 million, according to analysis.
The current interim leader of the party launched his bid to take over the reins full-time this week, promising to bring taxes for “middle Scotland” in line with the rest of the UK.
Scots on incomes between £27,000 and £43,430 currently pay up to £150 more in tax than people in the rest of the UK.
Those earning between that mark and £45,000 stump up an extra £500.
READ MORE: Jackson Carlaw vows to 'take down' Nicola Sturgeon in leadership pitch
However, the Fraser of Allander Institute (FAI) think tank said in a blog post that Carlaw’s proposed changes “might be seen as puzzling” after its analysis showed it would mostly benefit those earning £43,430 and above.
The post suggests the policy, which Carlaw would only be able to implement in the 2022/23 financial year and after a win in the 2021 Holyrood election, would benefit the top 20% of earners most.
The analysis concluded: “A policy framed as supporting ‘middle earners’ predominantly benefits households at the top of the distribution of household income.”
Scotland’s intermediate rate is currently 1% above that of the rest of the UK at 21%, following the devolution of income tax powers to Holyrood.
The analysis said: “If this policy was implemented in 2020/21, it would reduce the Government’s income tax revenues by around £270m.”
However, the think tank does state an uptick in jobs caused by the new tax powers could see the number reduce.
It said: “It could be argued that a tax cut might induce some increase in labour supply, which may mean that the policy ultimately costs somewhat less than this.
“However, the scale of the tax changes being proposed would suggest that the behavioural impact would be relatively small, so that the ultimate policy cost would only fall by £20m or so from the £270m static cost.”
READ MORE: First Minister brands Jackson Carlaw campaign launch 'comedy gold'
According to the institute, the reason the figure “appears surprisingly expensive” is because it will also be felt by those who earn more than £45,000 a year.
Carlaw had said: “I want to prioritise helping middle earners and start closing the tax gap with their friends in the rest of the UK.
“Tax cuts for those on high incomes are not my priority.
“In time and over the longer term, we will look at the whole tax system in Scotland and how it can better support growth and prosperity.”
Carlaw is set to take on fellow MSP Michelle Ballantyne in the leadership contest, with nominations due to close on Friday. Carlaw officially launched his leadership bid earlier this week.
Both have pledged to bring “blue collar conservatism” to the leadership of the party, which has been without a permanent figurehead since Ruth Davidson stood down in August.
Carlaw is currently seen as the front-runner for the position, boasting support from a majority of MSPs, all of the party’s council leaders in Scotland and some MPs.
But the interim leader said he “takes nothing for granted” when it comes to the leadership race.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel