Gathering Evidence
Martin MacInnes
Atlantic, £12.99
Review by Alastair Mabbott
Inverness-born Martin MacInnes’s debut novel, Infinite Ground, was shortlisted for the Saltire Awards, its metaphysical treatment of a man’s inexplicable disappearance evoking descriptions like “Borgesian” and “Kafkaesque”.
With the publication of Gathering Evidence, we can add the term Ballardian, such is its unsentimental eye, the apocalyptic dread sewn from the outset and the sense of its protagonists being reshaped by forces beyond their understanding.
It records the experiences of a couple, John and Shel, who spend the bulk of the novel apart. While Shel joins a team sent to a corporately-owned nature reserve to investigate the deaths of two bonobos, software designer John stays behind, suffering an injury on the building site of their future home which puts him out of commission for several weeks.
An ominous air has already been cast over proceedings by the prologue, which tells of the creation of an app, called Nest, which monitors its users’ activities down to the smallest detail. People become gradually more obsessed with it, until the app becomes a religion dedicated to analysing billions of readings to discern the ultimate truth. What this has to do with the story that follows isn’t made explicit, but it sets up an unease which is further deepened by mysterious fog, failing phones and a sense of being watched.
John is confined to a permanently fogbound house to recuperate from his injuries, remembering nothing about the incident that caused them, only what a doctor tells him on his daily visits. With no phone or wi-fi, and forbidden to drive, John is disoriented, unable to trust what he sees and hears, and he’s further distracted by a film of mould spreading across the walls and surfaces.
Shel, meanwhile, is in even more trying conditions, living in a nature reserve alongside a colony of bonobos, aware only of what the corporation that owns it, Westenra Ecology and Biodiversity Group, wants her to know. She and her team are methodically exploring the possibility that the bonobos were killed by an infection, and their fear of introducing any contaminant into the apes’ habitat and causing disruption to the natural order reaches paranoiac proportions.
Causality is one of Gathering Evidence’s preoccupations. Shel has a tendency to overthink the repercussions of her actions, while John, back home, fancies that he might reconstruct his memories by studying his surroundings and working backwards.
But MacInnes also dangles elements suggesting the presence of non-human intelligence just outside the limits of our perception: vast subterranean fungus networks and Shel’s observation of the “close structural similarity of psilocybin and serotonin ... as if little pieces of mind existed underground”.
Then there's her fear of being invaded by a cerebral virus, the appearance of unexpected mathematical patterns in nature, the misguided but logical behaviour of a smart fridge. But rather than presenting them in the manner a science fiction dystopia, Gathering Evidence works more like a ghost story, a novel of ideas whose allusiveness and vaguely-defined foreboding give it an unsettling power.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here