SCOTTISH Labour should support "the sovereign right of the Scottish people" to choose the country's future, according to the party's constitution spokesman.
Alex Rowley wrote in a pamphlet that he and his colleagues should look to diverge from the strict unionism of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.
But he said a referendum should only take place if two-thirds of MSPs support it.
Rowley was the second Scottish Labour member to speak out on the issue after health spokeswoman Monica Lennon said the "future of Scotland must be decided by the people of Scotland".
He stopped short of support for independence, instead appearing to advocate the "home rule" position touted by leader Richard Leonard in recent weeks.
That would result in substantial powers being devolved to Holyrood - leaving areas such as macroeconomics, defence and foreign policy in Westminster.
Home rule would be similar to what was called "devolution max" in the lead-up to the independence referendum in 2014.
Rowley wrote: "There are some within the Scottish Labour group who want us to rule out any referendum for the foreseeable future.
"This would put us alongside the Tories and illiberal Liberals and would play direct into the hands of Nicola Sturgeon."
The former deputy leader also said he did not believe the Scottish Government had a mandate for another vote through their past electoral successes but said the issue is not one that should be determined by Westminster.
He added: "My own view is that the option of the power sitting in the Scottish Parliament with a requirement of a two-thirds majority to trigger any future referendum is worth serious consideration."
According to the pamphlet, the issue should be put to members of the Scottish Labour Party and not decided by a "small band of MSPs".
Votes from 85 MSPs would be needed to make up two-thirds - meaning pro-union voices would have to be persuaded to supplement the 68 independence-supporting MSPs from the SNP and Scottish Green Party.
The Labour MSP claimed the First Minister was "not serious" about holding another vote this year, a position she has this week stood by despite the Prime Minister's rejection of the powers to hold another referendum.
Rowley suggested the SNP was looking to make the 2021 Holyrood election into a vote on Scotland's constitutional future - something he claimed was a "deliberate deflection tactic" from the party's record in Government.
He added: "We should also be clear that Labour supports the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine their own future and we should not weaken that position by being caught in this false argument about another referendum.
"Right now in Scotland there is no majority demanding a referendum so let us focus on our vision for Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel