By Billy Briggs and Ally Tibbitt
POLICE Scotland has a backlog of 2553 electronic items awaiting digital forensic analysis. A reply by the force to a Freedom of Information request reveals that items awaiting examination in the last six months of 2019 included 1483 phones, 229 laptops, 180 tablets and 229 hard drives.
The new stats on the digital backlog facing Police Scotland comes as the force rolls out the use of cyber kiosks. These devices allow officers to bypass encryption and read personal data from digital devices, including mobile phones or laptops, without using a password.
The force is under pressure from charities representing victims of crime to tackle the backlog as people are left paying bills for phones they are unable to use for months on end.
Officers hope that the roll-out of cyber kiosks – which plug into phones or tablets so trained operators can look for information relevant to an investigation – will help to cut the time victims of crimes are without their devices, but privacy campaigners say the rules that govern how kiosks are used still need to be tightened up.
READ MORE: Cyber kiosks: Another Police Scotland mess now fallen to MSPs to sort
Police Scotland bought 41 cyber kiosks and had intended to use them from autumn 2018 but their introduction was postponed amid concerns over the legal basis for their use.
The force believes the devices will significantly speed up investigations. But a number of groups continue to argue that the legal basis for device examination has not been made sufficiently clear.
Police Scotland only disclosed the information after The Ferret appealed to the Scottish Information Commissioner. Matthew Rice, Scotland director for Open Rights Group, said the whole system of seizing and examining digital devices in Scotland “needs proper legal reform to maintain respect for individuals’ right to privacy”.
He added: “These searches are deeply intrusive and our legal system in Scotland is not fit to respond to that level of intrusion. Open Rights Group called on Police Scotland to prevent rolling out until the Scottish Government reformed the law to provide an overarching framework for the seizure of electronic devices in Scotland in line with human rights standards.
“That recommendation has not been heeded by the Government and, as a result, we will shortly have intrusive technology available for use by police in Scotland under laws that don’t meet fundamental standards of accessibility and foreseeability for the individual.
“For the sake of everyone involved in the justice system – suspects, witnesses and victims – we need to update our laws. Without this, in the pursuit of meeting the challenge of modern policing, these kiosks may create more problems than they solve.”
Scottish Greens justice spokesperson John Finnie said his party had some concerns over cyber kiosks, adding that Police Scotland should not have pressed on with a trial of the devices without impact assessments on human rights and data usage.
He added: “That’s why MSPs paused the roll-out and put this scheme under fierce scrutiny to balance privacy and safety.
READ MORE: Police Scotland's cyber kiosk roll-out criticised by MSPs
‘‘Used properly, this technology can reduce the backlog, and it’s clear that a clear legal framework and safeguards can also inform the development and much-needed debate of future technologies such as live facial recognition.”
Liam McArthur, justice spokesperson for the Scots LibDems, said: “Police Scotland is pushing ahead with this new technology despite knowing the concerns that exist over whether or not there is sufficient legal basis for its use.
‘‘It seems inevitable that the use of cyber kiosks will be challenged and if so, it will not reflect well on Police Scotland management if they are found to have pushed into uncharted territory without proper legal safeguards being in place.”
Sandy Brindley, of Rape Crisis Scotland, said some female rape victims had waited for years to have phones returned by police after they were held during investigations.
She added that progress had been made recently though and that Rape Crisis Scotland was liaising with Police Scotland.
“To be left without a device that most of us rely so heavily on for long periods with no indication of when it may be returned is just not good enough. It also compounds the lack of control that many survivors feel following trauma,” Brindley continued.
“It is clear though more broadly that there are bigger questions that still require answers in terms of process, accountability and transparency when it comes to handling digital devices.”
IN reply, Deputy Chief Constable Malcolm Graham said the new stats revealing the Police Scotland backlog “underline exactly why we have introduced cyber kiosks”.
He added: “By quickly identifying devices which do and do not contain evidence, we can minimise the intrusion on people’s lives and provide a better service to the public.
“We are committed to providing the best possible service to victims and witnesses of crime. This means we must keep pace with society. People of all ages now lead a significant part of their lives online and this is reflected in how we investigate crime and the evidence we present to courts. Many online offences disproportionately affect the most vulnerable people in our society, such as children at risk of sexual abuse, and our priority is to protect those people.
“Increases in the involvement of digital devices in investigations and the ever-expanding capabilities of these devices mean that demand on digital forensic examinations is higher than ever. Current limitations, however, mean the devices of victims, witnesses and suspects can be taken for months at a time, even if it later transpired that there is no worthwhile evidence on them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel