SCOTTISH Labour leader Richard Leonard has stunned MSPs at First Minister’s Questions as he used his slot at the weekly joust to criticise Scottish Labour’s record in government.
In an incredible own goal that left his own benches stoney faced, the MSP quizzed the SNP leader on a report published earlier this week about the use of privately financed contracts for public infrastructure.
Audit Scotland said Scotland's public sector has paid £13.1 billion in annual payments for a total of 136 projects built since 1998-99 and will pay a further £27bn between now and 2047-48.
Those buildings were constructed under both Labour’s PFI and the SNP Non-Profit-Distributing model.
WATCH: Richard Leonard sparks fits of laughter at FMQs
However, Leonard tried to claim that his Labour party wasn’t the Labour party of Donald Dewar, Jack McConnell and Henry McLeish.
Leonard said: “The SNP government claim that their so-called non-profit distributing (NPD) model took the profit motive and the shareholder dividend out of the building and running of the public infrastructure projects in Scotland. But this week’s Audit Scotland and Accounts Commission report blows a hole in that claim. First Minister, do you accept their conclusions or are you in denial?”
An incredulous Sturgeon told MSPs: “Do you know when I was thinking about what Richard Leonard might ask me about today, I thought he won't really go on PFI, will he? But he has and who am I to complain?”
She said the government had to use the NPD model because “of the £6bn cumulative cut to our capital budget imposed by the Tories”. Without, it she added, they “wouldn't have been able to build the 117 schools, the hospitals and the other public sector buildings.”
READ MORE: Desperate Labour spin doctors spring into action after Leonard blunder
However, the SNP leader said their model made improvements on Labour's PFI, including the capping of profits.
“Under Labour's PFI if surpluses were made do you know where they went? They went into the pockets of investors. Under our system surpluses got reinvested into the public sector,“ Sturgeon said.
Leonard said he had anticipated how the First Minister might respond to his first question.
“So I went back to look at a report which I wrote 25 years ago, and here is an extract from it, here's the report,” he told MSPs as he held the document aloft, “the PFI is something of a con trick predicated on a buy-now-pay-alter mirage.
“It is a mirage because the tax payer or the user will simply pay more in the end. It is smart accountancy but bad economics. The fact is that government can always borrow at a lower interest rate than the private sector.
“So I have been consistent on this question. Has the First Minister?” he claimed.
At that point the Presiding Officer had to intervene because of the laughter from the SNP and Tory benches.
READ MORE: FMQs Sketch: At least somebody enjoyed First Minister's Questions today...
Sturgeon replied: “Well, firstly on capital value, Richard Leonard says NPD projects costs three times the capital value, that's a vast improvement on the five and a half times value under Labour's scheme.
“On transparency under the old Labour-supported scheme you used to have to wait after 25 years after the asset was completed before you got the information about it.
“We now publish most of that material two years after an asset is complete, so much greater transparency.
“But Richard Leonard, bless, wrote a report 25 years ago. Isn't it a real shame that the Labour governments who followed in the years after that ignored everything that Richard Leonard said and it took an SNP government to act on the things that he said.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel