THE former president of the UN's COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, who was sacked by the UK Government last week, has launched a scathing attack on the Prime Minister's environmental record.
In her letter to Boris Johnson, Claire Perry O'Neill suggested his personal animosity towards First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is endangering the success of the summit.
The former clean growth minister also claimed the Prime Minister is considering relocating the event to an "English location" because of "ballooning costs".
O'Neill spoke out as Johnson outlined some new climate measures, including a ban on sales of new petrol and diesel vehicles from 2035.
The Financial Times published a letter written by O'Neill to Johnson in which she said promises are "not close to being met".
READ MORE: COP26 in 'chaos and confusion' as conference is launched
She wrote: "You promised to 'lead from the front' and asked me what was needed: 'Money, people, just tell us!' Sadly these promises are not close to being met."
She added: "This isn't a pretty place to be and we owe the world a lot better."
O'Neill said Johnson had not convened the Cabinet sub-committee on climate change as promised and added his government is "miles off track" in setting a positive agenda ahead of the November summit.
She went on: "I am told by COP unit sources that budgets (which I do not see) are ballooning, the team and the Scottish Government are in an extraordinary state of stand-off and that you are considering re-locating the event to an English location.
"I had asked if you would consider re-setting your relationship with the First Minister - putting aside the devolution battle for the sake of this vastly important agenda. I understand you declined in salty terms."
Last year the COP26 made headlines as it emerged that while speaking at the Conservative confernece, Johnson had suggested he would not want Nicola Sturgeon at the summit.
READ MORE: Video shows PM say he doesn't want FM 'anywhere near' summit
The talks this autumn will be the most important since the Paris Agreement to curb global warming was secured in 2015.
At the summit, countries are expected to deliver more ambitious domestic plans for cutting greenhouse gases by 2030.
O'Neill, who stood down as a Tory MP at the General Election, was sacked as president of the talks by the PM's special adviser, Dominic Cummings, on Friday, with the Government saying the post would be a ministerial role in future.
But Nick Mabey, chief executive of climate change think-tank E3G, said the UK's presidency had got off to a bumpy start with the decision to dismiss her.
Her replacement has a "daunting task" and will need to be a political heavy hitter, with an immense diplomatic effort needed from the UK to steer the negotiations, he said.
O'Neill is also reportedly consulting lawyers about what she claims were "false, distorted and defamatory" briefings about her record, saying Number 10 was "rumoured" to be behind the briefings.
She told the Financial Times she had been considered for a peerage by Downing Street to give her more authority in her UN summit role, but this had now been "firmly rescinded".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel