THE man who masterminded the pro-Union 'Vow' on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum has been hired as the SNP’s new spin doctor.
Former Daily Record editor Murray Foote, a Yes convert, will start next week as the party’s head of communications and research at Holyrood.
Foote, 53, was instrumental in orchestrating the Vow and putting it on the Record’s front page two days before the September 18 vote after a shock poll put Yes ahead.
Signed by Tory Prime Minister David Cameron, Labour’s Ed Miliband and LibDem Nick Clegg, it promised “extensive new powers” for Holyrood if Scots voted No.
Former First Minister Alex Salmond credited it with swaying public opinion against independence, although pollsters say its influence has been over-rated.
READ MORE: Labour MP Lisa Nandy claims SNP should be excluded from UK-wide debates/
It has nevertheless become an object of loathing and derision for many Yes supporters.
Foote told The Herald today: “I have always been sympathetic to the cause. Anybody who knows me knows - this does not come as a surprise to them.”
Asked about the Vow, he said: “I had a job to do. My job was to represent the views of the readership of the Daily Record. That was what I did to the best of my ability, regardless of my political persuasion.”
In 2018, after retiring as four years as Record editor, Foote announced he was a supporter of independence.
Foote defended the Vow in 2018 in an interview with The National after announcing he supported independence. In the interview he refused to say how he voted in the 2014 referendum.
But asked if the Vow might in the end be seen as a step towards independence, he said: “That’s exactly what it will be.”
He said the motivation for the Vow was to hold the pro-Union politicians to their word that they would deliver more powers to Holyrood in the event of a No vote. Just ahead of the vote a newspaper poll put the Yes side ahead prompting nervous Unionists to promise greater devolution.
Foote said: “There has been a lot of nonsense written about the Vow and the motivation for it. The motivation was purely out of distrust with the Unionist line that we were given by politicians that more powers would come.
“As prior to the infamous or famous Sunday Times poll which put Yes ahead, the Better Together campaign could barely agree which day of the week it was let alone which powers would be further devolved.”
Asked now, as an independence supporter, if he regretted the Vow, he said: “Absolutely not, the Vow was done in good faith at the time it was done and I do not recognise any suggestion it affected the material outcome of the vote … it was pretty obvious it was the economy. I don’t recognise that I was either the saviour of the Union or the person who prevented independence.”
He said that the Vow ensured that more powers were devolved, and pointing to income tax and social security powers moving to Holyrood, he said these measures allowed the Scottish Government to distinguish itself positively from the Conservative Government at Westminster.
WATCH: Tory MP justifies exclusion of Scots media from Brexit plan briefing
“My personal view is that [the Vow] will be looked upon as another stepping stone that allowed the current government to display a substantial change to the way Westminster governs Britain and Holyrood governs Scotland.
“We keep hearing the word compassionate from Jeane Freeman [the Health Secretary and former social security minster] about the new benefit system and I hope that is the case.
“If [the Vow] saves some Scots the ignominy of the dreadful rigours that are placed upon the most vulnerable in society … if that alleviates some of the misery, then it’s been a great thing.”
A media veteran with 33 years in newspapers, his appointment will be seen as a major coup by the SNP as it heads towards the 2021 Holyrood election, albeit a controversial one.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel