THE Scottish Tories have been accused of “trying to con” voters with their demands for this week’s Budget.
Murdo Fraser, the party’s finance spokesman, will use a debate in Holyrood today to ask for £15.4 million to be spent on residential drug rehabilitation beds, £50m for the police to ensure 750 officers keep their jobs, and cash to go towards tackling homelessness. But the SNP criticised the demands, saying Scotland’s annual budget has fallen by £2 billion in real terms since 2010.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Tory criticism of police funds takes nerve
SNP MSP Tom Arthur said: “The Tory leadership candidates are trying to con voters by promising extra cash on public services while handing their rich pals a tax cut – it just doesn’t add up.”
The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Scotland has previously argued that adopting Westminster’s income tax plans would cost Scotland more than £1bn across four years – which the think tank has described as “unaffordable”.
Finance Secretary Derek Mackay will announce the draft tax and spending plans tomorrow.
The process was pushed back from December following a delay from the UK Government in laying out its own Budget – with worries circulating at Holyrood over a lack of time to scrutinise the Scottish Government’s spending plans.
For the last four years the minority SNP administration has relied on support from the Scottish Greens to get their budget through Holyrood.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens call on Government to focus on public transport in Budget
However, Patrick Harvie has suggested there’s still some way to go before his colleagues back Mackay’s plans.
“The Scottish Government has used the language of a climate emergency, but so far we’ve not seen anything in the way of an emergency response,” he said. “If the Cabinet Secretary is serious about delivering a transformative budget that begins to tackle the climate emergency he shouldn’t miss the opportunity to act.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel