Boris Johnson has given HS2 the go-ahead, claiming his Government had the "guts to take the decision" to deliver prosperity across the country.
The Prime Minister acknowledged that "cost forecasts have exploded" and criticised the company responsible for developing the high-speed railway.
"I cannot say that HS2 Ltd has distinguished itself in the handling of local communities," he told the Commons.
But he insisted that "poor management to date has not detracted from the fundamental value of the project".
He announced that HS2 Ltd can "focus solely" on building the railway between London and Crewe, while "new delivery arrangements" will be created by the Government for the Phase 2b stretches from Crewe to Manchester, and Birmingham to Leeds.
Johnson added that the Government will "look at how we can best design and integrate rail investments across the North including Northern Powerhouse Rail between Leeds and Manchester".
READ MORE: WATCH: Dominic Cummings claims PJ Masks will do better job than Cabinet
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn warned that Johnson "promised so much in the general election" to people in the Midlands and the North, but they will be "sorely disappointed when they see what actually happens".
He claimed the Government has "proved itself unable to manage infrastructure projects properly and incapable of keeping a lid on the cost".
The Confederation of British Industry welcomed the decision with chief UK policy director Matthew Fell saying it was "exactly the sort of bold, decisive action required to inject confidence in the economy".
But Greenpeace UK executive director John Sauven said Johnson's decision would give him the "dubious honour of being this century's largest destroyer of ancient woodlands in the UK".
The decision has caused splits in the Conservative Party over cost and environmental concerns.
HS2 critic and Lichfield MP Michael Fabricant warned the railway will cause "immense" damage to the countryside.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen for North West Leicestershire told the chamber HS2 is "unloved, unwanted and has been grossly mismanaged".
The Prime Minister's announcement follows the completion of a Government-commissioned review by former HS2 Ltd chairman Douglas Oakervee into whether or not the programme should be scrapped.
The Oakervee Review recommended that ministers should proceed with the project, but warned that the final bill could reach £106 billion at 2019 prices, compared with a budget of £62.4bn.
READ MORE: Extinction Rebellion attempts to prevent tree felling in HS2
Phase 1 between Euston and Birmingham was due to open in December 2026, but that has been delayed.
The current plan for the start of services is:
- Old Oak Common to Birmingham: 2029-31
- Euston to Birmingham: 2031-39
- Euston to Manchester and Leeds: 2037-40
The Prime Minister told MPs that to avoid "further blowouts" in HS2's cost or schedule, a series of measures will be taken to "restore discipline".
This will include appointing a minister whose full-time job will be to oversee the project, and changes to the way HS2 is managed.
Johnson also announced a five-year £5bn cash injection to boost bus and cycle links in English regions outside London.
He said the country is being "held back by our inadequate infrastructure" and pledged to create a "transport revolution".
Corbyn responded by accusing the Government of being unwilling to make the investment needed to revive parts of the country "decimated by successive Conservative governments".
The Labour leader also claimed the Prime Minister is fond of announcing "big shiny projects", such as exploring the possibility of a bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland, joking: "Why not go the whole hog and make it a garden bridge connected to an airport on the sea?"
When he was mayor of London, Johnson proposed the building of a pedestrianised bridge covered with trees and flowers, and an airport in the Thames Estuary which opponents referred to as "Boris Island". Neither scheme went ahead.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here