The UK Government has been fuelling Scottish independence by failing to engage with public opinion, it has been suggested.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard (Edinburgh East) warned the Conservatives against throwing out "sensible proposals" made by his party during a debate on whether Scotland could have a separate migration system.
And he said that there is a rising number of people in the country who want Scotland to be able to choose a different path to that of the United Kingdom.
He said: "A clear majority of people would express the wish that we should choose a different path, an independent path where we could control our own destiny, make our own decisions, make our own mistakes and learn from them because the people that live in that country and only the people who live in that country have got the right to determine how they are governed going forward.
- READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Has Holyrood failed to use its powers to combat inequality?
- READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Was Scotland's 2014 indyref REALLY dark and divisive?
- READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Claim SNP is responsible for cost of whisky in Scotland
"That is the sentiment that is growing now in Scotland and as much as the Government may want to put its head in the sand and ignore that that's happening, I caution them to engage with public opinion in Scotland because every time they refuse to do so, they simply fuel the appetite for change, they fuel the number of people who say, 'we don't want to put up with this anymore, we now look with fresh eyes at the alternatives on offer'."
He continued: "In many ways, the Government so far since the election has been doing this party's job for it. The opinion polls are rising – more and more people in Scotland are demanding and getting behind the cause of independence and we haven't even started the campaign. This is all the work of the United Kingdom Government."
Sheppard added: "If you throw out sensible proposals like this one, which would be to the benefit of the Scottish economy, the benefit of the people in Scotland, but which might also be something very sensible to do while Scotland remains in the United Kingdom, if you throw this out and ignore the arguments that we are making, then you fuel that appetite and that desire even more."
READ MORE: Scotland should have a referendum on the same day as Ireland
Asked about which currency would be used in an independent Scotland, he said: "We will not be too many years hence until Scotland will be a strong and prosperous economy with its own currency, its own central bank and punching well above its weight compared to what it is today."
On the prospect of whether an independent Scotland, which was part of the European Union, would use the euro, Sheppard said: "No it wouldn't, no it wouldn't. Nor is there any requirement for it to be so."
Scotland Office minister Douglas Ross said there would "not be a meeting of minds" with the SNP on the issue of a separate migration system, noting: "This Government is committed to introducing a new immigration system that works for the whole of the UK – for Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
"That's why the Government has engaged and continues to engage extensively with many stakeholders across Scotland, including the Scottish Government but crucially also businesses across a wide range of sectors."
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon tells the EU: We've never needed you more
Ross said the UK Government is committed to developing a system which addresses challenges in the whole country, adding: "We have no plans to devolve powers of immigration."
He claimed such a move would bring about "significant complexities".
For Labour, shadow immigration minister Bell Ribeiro-Addy agreed with the need for the Home Secretary to "engage positively" with the proposals, but also said: "We on this frontbench do not believe Scotland is a uniquely special case that would require a tailored migration policy for Scotland."
She went on: "The widespread use of devolved powers in immigration could create a bizarre and unworkable recruitment process and practice across the regions if others started to take a less rational approach because of changes in government."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel