THE cases of eight people who were due to be deported to Jamaica are being reviewed by the Home Office after fresh legal representations were made.
Some 50 people were expected to be on the flight that left the UK on Tuesday morning.
But it ended up taking off with 17 on board after a last-minute legal battle between the UK Government and human rights campaigners.
Officials and ministers have argued that all due to be deported were foreign criminals who had committed serious offences – but campaigners, supported by 150 MPs, say they came to the country as children and are “British in every meaningful way”.
They also argue that some were sentenced for one-time drug offences when they were young.
Tajay Thompson, who was one of those to be granted a last-minute reprieve, served half of a 15-month sentence in 2015 after he was convicted of possessing crack cocaine and heroin with intent to supply as a 17-year-old.
He had previously told how he was groomed by a gang and forced to sell drugs as a teenager, and has not re-offended since his release.
READ MORE: MPs attack Tories over 'totally unacceptable' Jamaica deportation
Now aged 23, Thomson had originally arrived in Britain at five and lives with his mother and younger brother in Battersea, south London.
He says he has only ever visited Jamaica twice on holiday since.
Thomson remains in Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre near Heathrow Airport, where he had been awaiting the flight. He said: "I feel happy, but also I don't. I'm still stuck here.
"I want to be free, I want to be with my family and carry on my life but I can't.
"I don't know what is going on. I was told I was going on the flight, then my ticket was cancelled.
"The atmosphere was very low yesterday but it is very lively right now.
READ MORE: Arran woman made to leave Scotland by Home Office wins visa battle
"Some of the other people here were told they were going but haven't, or they were brought back from the plane."
Lawyers are now applying for him to be released on bail, and hope at some point to help him to secure permanent leave to remain in the UK.
However, the UK Government has said that it will urgently appeal against the Court of Appeal ruling that prevented 25 people from boarding the flight.
The ruling came after concerns were raised about whether those being held in detention centres had adequate access to legal advice.
Under the UK Borders Act 2007, the Home Office must make a deportation order where a foreign national has been convicted of an offence and received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more.
But there are several exceptions to this – including when doing so would breach someone’s human rights or the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention.
Lady Justice Simler last night ordered the Home Office not to carry out the scheduled deportation of some people amid concerns that problems with mobile phone signal at the Colnbrook and Harmondsworth centres in Heathrow had prevented them from having adequate access to legal advice while in detention awaiting deportation.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman has said that the government made "no apology whatsoever for seeking to remove serious foreign national offenders".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here