THE UK Government has started negotiations with a London venue over moving the COP26 conference from Glasgow.
According to the Financial Times, claims over spiralling costs and chaos surrounding preparations have forced officials to look to the ExCel London as a “fallback option”.
Government officials confirmed that the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy had held talks.
“It’s normal for an event of this magnitude to have contingency measures,” said one. “We are pretty committed to Scotland.”
The Scottish Government and the now-former chair of the event have been critical of the UK Government’s handling of COP26 preparations.
READ MORE: Would moving COP26 to England be a step too far for Johnson?
Claire O’Neill hit out at Boris Johnson and the UK Government, accusing them of showing a lack of leadership on climate change and that preparations for the event were “miles off track”.
So far, no successor had been chosen, with several key figures said to have turned the role down.
The former energy minister also criticised the lack of an “absolute firm location”.
O'Neill was also critical of the Scottish Government, though also said she suggested Nicola Sturgeon should be given a key role – a suggestion rebuffed by the PM.
READ MORE: Greens: 'UK Government more interested in Union flags than COP26'
Yesterday, at the Countdown to COP26 event, the First Minister said the Scottish Government would work "closely and constructively" on the running of the event.
At the same event, Michael Gove refused to be drawn on who would replace O'Neill as chair.
READ MORE: Michael Gove silent on who will replace COP26 Glasgow chair
A Cabinet reshuffle is due this week, with Tory Scottish Secretary Alister Jack tipped to be reshuffled.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel