BERNIE Sanders would not interfere in indyref2 if he was elected US president, according to his brother.
Larry Sanders was in Edinburgh on Thursday to speak alongside who National columnist Lesley Riddoch at an Edinburgh event.
The England and Wales Green Party health spokesman gingerly waded into the debate Scotland's constitutional future, claiming his brother would err on the side of self determination.
He referenced President Barack Obama's decision to get involved in the independence referendum 2014, and again during the EU vote in 2016.
Admitting he had not actually spoken to his brother about the issue, Sanders said: "I think his take would be that people are entitled to make their own choices."
READ MORE: Bernie Sanders would be 'favourable' to Scottish independence
He also said Scotland's political atmosphere "chimes much better" with his brother's world view than the rest of the UK.
He said: "There's a much different atmosphere coming from Scotland, not just from the Government but from beyond the Government as well.
"That chimes in many more ways with Bernard's world view."
Despite the crossover in some policy areas, such as universal health care, free tuition and environmental restrictions, Sanders suggested his brother – if he were to become president in this year's election –would not favour Holyrood over Westminster.
He said: "He's a very experienced politician and he's a bright guy.
"His relationships will be proper. He won't be asking the UK to send troops some place – as other US presidents have done – which I hope the UK thinks is a good idea."
The 84-year-old is confident about his brother's chances of not only seizing the Democratic nomination in upcoming primary votes, but defeating the incumbent Donald Trump.
Of a possible contest for the White House, Sanders said: "I think he'd wipe [President Trump] up."
Sanders pointed to the polling aggregator Real Clear Politics, which compiled more than 60 polls – only five of which put Trump ahead.
Sanders also touted the importance of electing more members of the Green Party at next year's Holyrood election, claiming the SNP are "good with the verbiage" of climate change, but need to improve their policy offering.
Sanders is currently just one delegate behind Pete Buttigeg after Democrats voted in the first two states.
Primaries and caucuses will run throughout the US in the coming months to determine the Democrat nominee, with votes deciding the number of delegates sent to this summer's convention to vote for a specific candidate.
As part of the primary being touted by the elder Sanders brother in the UK, 13 presidential delegates are up for grabs – similar to mainland states Wyoming and North Dakota which have 14 delegates each.
US citizens can vote online or at voting booths set up in Edinburgh and St Andrews between February 18 and March 7.
Sanders was promoting the Democrats Abroad Primary – which gives US citizens the chance to vote for the party's nominee in different countries – at the event Democracy v Demagogues event.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel