JUSTICE Secretary Humza Yousaf has expressed his "deep reservations" about a new UK Government law to prevent terrorists from being automatically released from jail halfway through their sentences.
Yousaf said the legislation, which is being fast-tracked through Westminster, was not the "most favourable approach".
But he urged MSPs to give their consent to the Terrorist Offenders (Restriction of Early Release) Bill, saying without this there was a risk of "error or confusion within the law".
The Scottish Government has lodged a Legislative Consent Memorandum (LCM) – which is customary when Westminster legislation impacts on devolved policy areas.
By proposing that move, Green MSP John Finnie questioned if Yousaf was "pandering to a racist UK Prime Minister".
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon hasn't spoken to Derek Mackay since resignation
The Justice Secretary hit back, leading Finnie to "unreservedly apologise" for the "clumsy" way in which he put the question, insisting "there was no offence intended".
Yousaf said: "Please don't suggest to me I am pandering to racism or a racist Prime Minister, as someone who has been on the other side of that – and I suspect he has very rarely been on the other side of that."
He was also clear: "Do not take the Government lodging an LCM as support for the UK Government's policy.
"I have deep reservations about the fact that this probably just kicks the problem down the can."
The UK Government's proposal aims to ensure terrorist offenders serve two-thirds of their sentence before they are considered eligible for release, rather than the current halfway mark.
READ MORE: Jackson Carlaw sacks rival Michelle Ballantyne in cabinet reshuffle
Before being freed they would need to be reviewed by a panel of specialist judges and psychiatrists at the Parole Board.
Yousaf told MSPs on Holyrood's Justice Committee: "If you want to tackle the issue of radicalisation, there are numerous reports and research which shows that actually prison is one place where people are further radicalised not deradicalised.
"I want to make the point as forcefully as I can, on the record, that I do have deep reservations and misgivings around the approach.
"But the judgment I have to make is if I do not promote this LCM there will absolutely be errors and confusion in the law of how terrorist offences are then dealt with."
Under the current system, prisoners sentenced to four years or more in Scotland are eligible for parole halfway through their sentence – with this to be increased to the two-thirds point if the LCM is passed by MSPs.
READ MORE: Scottish Budget: Greens question SNP over low-carbon investments
The Bill has already cleared all its stages in the Commons, with the UK Government intent on getting the legislation through by February 27, before the next terrorist prisoner comes up for release.
It was introduced by the UK Government after the terror attack in Streatham, London, earlier this month when Sudesh Amman stabbed two bystanders with a knife he had grabbed from a shop.
The 20-year-old was jailed in December 2018 for possessing and distributing terrorist documents but had been freed midway through his sentence less than a fortnight earlier.
It was the second attack in three months to be carried out by a convicted terrorist, after Usman Khan stabbed and killed two people at Fishmongers' Hall near London Bridge in November.
He had been released nearly a year earlier, halfway through a 16-year jail sentence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel