Jackson Carlaw has defended the gender balance on his new Scottish Conservatives frontbench team after it was described by Nicola Sturgeon as "shockingly poor".
The new leader sacked rival Michelle Ballantyne as social security spokeswoman, with Graham Simpson brought in amid a reshuffle of roles.
His new team comprises three women and 10 men but when asked about concerns about imbalance, he dismissed it as a "ridiculous assertion".
"I've only got seven women MSPs, two of whom are not standing again," he said.
"I think the important thing from my perspective is what is the shape of this party after 2021 and you can rest assured it will be more representative of Scotland."
The remaining women on the Scottish Conservatives' frontbench are Annie Wells, who was promoted to environment spokeswoman and joint deputy leader; Rachael Hamilton, who was given the rural affairs and tourism brief, and Liz Smith, who was moved from her education portfolio to become the new chief whip – a role not previously included in the party's so-called shadow Cabinet.
READ MORE: Jackson Carlaw sacks rival Michelle Ballantyne in cabinet reshuffle
The First Minister, whose 11 Cabinet secretaries include five women, tweeted: "In this day and age – and with all the available evidence about the importance of diversity in decision making – having a 'shadow cabinet' that is 75% male is shockingly poor."
Carlaw revealed more Conservative MSPs are planning to stand down at the next Holyrood election, while dodging the question of whether Ruth Davidson plans to quit the Scottish Parliament before 2021.
Davidson, who led the party from 2011 to 2019, has not been given a role in the Scottish Conservatives' new team, with Carlaw explaining he had "long conversations" with her and she she was "quite content" with her position on the Scottish Parliament's Corporate Body.
Asked whether he had offered her a frontbench role, he said: "I've had the discussion with her and it's not something she's looking for."
Heavily linked with a peerage so she can enter the House of Lords, Carlaw declined to answer whether Davidson wanted to quit Holyrood before the election takes place next year.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes made Finance Secretary in First Minister’s reshuffle
"Ruth is standing down no later than the end of this Parliament," he said.
"A number of colleagues have told me they're standing down next year. They haven't all made that position public yet."
Carlaw said his frontbench appointments "were the right team and a united team to take forward the fight to the SNP and give Scotland that alternative it needs".
On his decision not to give leadership contender Michelle Ballantyne a frontbench role, Carlaw said: "I had an early conversation with Michelle and I have offered Michelle another important position, which will become apparent this afternoon.
"It's a key opportunity that I think she can make a great deal of, and I think she's the right person for it."
It later emerged Ballantyne has been put forward to become convener of Holyrood's Economy, Fair Work and Culture Committee – but this will need to be voted on by the committee's other members.
Carlaw explained dropping farmer Peter Chapman from the rural affairs brief in favour of Hamilton was partly due to Chapman's decision to step down at the 2021 election and the expansion of the role to include tourism.
"Who better to have a say on tourism than someone who actually attracts tourists to her hotel," Carlaw said of the hotelier and Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel