THE number of women being sent sexually explicit images by strangers on trains is going “largely unreported” despite a spike in incidents, new data has revealed.
Reports of cyber-flashing to police have almost doubled in a year, although campaigners say the number of women affected “will almost certainly be much higher”.
Despite the rise there was only one arrest in 2019, according to data.
Cyber-flashing is when a person is sent an unsolicited sexual image on their device by a stranger nearby through AirDrop, a file-sharing function on iPhones.
Victims – often targeted on trains due to the technology’s short range – said it caused them to feel fearful on public transport.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black: The conversation on sexual abuse must continue
First reported to the force in 2015, figures obtained by the Press Association through a Freedom of Information (FoI) request, show that incidents more than doubled year-on-year in 2016, 2017 and 2018.
In 2019, there were 66 reports of cyber-flashing – almost double the 34 reports in 2018, and a large jump since 2016, when three incidents were reported.
Although numbers have leapt year-on-year, police believe it is still going under-reported due to victims believing the incident is “not serious enough” to speak to officers.
The data, from England, Scotland and Wales, shows there was only one arrest in connection with cyber-flashing made by British Transport Police (BTP) last year, which records incidents under their malicious communications act.
The force says the majority of incidents result in the failure to identify a suspect, due to difficulty in tracing the perpetrator.
If a person’s AirDrop settings are set to “Everyone”, it means someone outside of their contacts list can request to send them a file.
This can be done anonymously, as all that is shown on the receiving device is a preview of the picture and the name of the iPhone sending the file.
In 2019, where the victim’s gender was recorded by the force, the majority of those targeted (88%) were women.
More than half (57%) of those whose ages were taken by officers were aged between 21 and 30.
Rebecca Hitchen, campaigns manager at End Violence Against Women Coalition, said the increase shows women are becoming “more confident they will be taken seriously” if they come forward.
But she added: “It can also suggest that this particular behaviour is becoming more common.
“What we do know is that the actual number of women affected by this will almost certainly be much higher than the number of reports, and it will be impacting on their ability to go about their lives feeling safe and free.”
Clare McGlynn, professor in law at Durham University and an expert on image-based sexual abuse, said the rising number of reports shows “women have had enough of this harassment”.
“Now we need action, recognising that cyber-flashing can be very frightening and adversely impact on women’s daily lives,” she said.
Detective Inspector Ashley Cooper, from BTP, advised people to review their AirDrop settings to only receive messages from people in their contacts list.
He said: “As with other forms of sexual harassment, we believe that cases of cyber-flashing, which can involve the sending of unwanted, threatening or explicit sexual communications, goes largely unreported – either because victims don’t feel the incident is serious enough to report or simply because they don’t know where to turn. If you are a victim of cyber-flashing, our advice would be to report the matter to police as soon as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel