THE UK Government is pursuing a "dangerous, damaging and isolationist" path on Brexit, according to Scotland's Constitutional Relations Secretary.
Michael Russell said the Scottish Government is stepping up its "defence" against Westminster's plans as it exits the EU.
Boris Johnson's administration is set to deliver a "hard, uncompromising, extreme Brexit, which rejects co-operation and collaboration and instead seeks to retreat into some mythical empire", he said.
Against that backdrop, Russell said the Scottish Government would seek to "maintain dynamic alignment" with Europe on areas such as environmental regulations and employment standards.
A new Continuity Bill will be introduced to Holyrood "soon", the minister confirmed, after a legal challenge by the UK Government ended a previous attempt at legislation.
Russell made clear to UK ministers that when it comes to devolved areas, it is Scotland and not Westminster that should decide if policy continues to mirror that of the EU or not.
The Scottish Government's position of continued alignment with Europe is being adopted "with a view to reaccession", he told MSPs on the Scottish Parliament's Europe Committee.
Russell said: "One of our main tools will be the new Continuity Bill, which will be introduced to the Parliament soon.
"We will assert our right to operate in the areas of competence in the closest and most dynamic alignment with the EU that we can secure.
"We will defend that right vigorously if it is challenged by the UK Government."
He added: "It is our firm view that the extent to which devolved law aligns itself with the law of the EU should be a decision for this Parliament to take and no-one else."
The Constitutional Relations Secretary used his committee appearance to attack the UK Government's Brexit stance, saying the decision to end freedom of movement, coupled with the "stringent and ridiculous UK Government new immigration plans", would reduce the working population north of the border.
This could have particular impact on the NHS and social care sectors, he warned.
While Tory ministers have suggested a Canada-style trade deal with the EU as a way forward for the UK, Russell said this would lead to a £9 billion fall in Scotland's national economic output.
But worse would be a "Australian-style relationship", he said, claiming this was a Tory "code for no deal, because there is no EU deal with Australia".
He added: "An Australian-style deal, or more accurately a no-deal, will lead to a fall of £12.7 billion. Trade, inward investment and productivity will be hit.
"In 2018, overseas exports of food from Scotland were valued at around £1.6bn, of which £1.1bn – about two-thirds – went to countries within the European Union. That will be hit."
Russell told the committee: "This obvious hardest of hard-line positions is what the UK Government has now drawn in the European sand.
"So the Scottish Government must in these circumstances reassess its own position.
"We will of course do all we can to limit the damage, we will continue to try to talk some sense into the UK Government. But we will also have to prioritise now not persuasion but defence.
"We will have to work even harder on securing Scotland's rights, mitigating the negative impacts of Brexit while seeking every opportunity to give Scotland the right to choose a different and more sensible path."
Russell added: "We will of course continue trying to protect Scotland's interests because that is our job but unless something fundamental changes, the UK now intends to do the hardest of Brexits to us, rather than negotiating the type of Brexit we want with us.
"So we will have to stand up for ourselves to stop that happening."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel