HOLYROOD has passed historic new legislation that will give foreign nationals and some prisoners the right to vote in Scottish elections.
But MSPs voted down proposals from the Scottish Greens that would have seen asylum seekers permitted to take part in ballots.
Constitution Secretary Mike Russell said while he had the "greatest sympathy" for the move, there were "practical concerns" about extending the franchise to asylum seekers.
The passing of the Scottish Elections (Franchise and Representation) Bill means that foreign nationals, including refugees, will be allowed to vote in both Holyrood and local council elections.
In addition, prisoners serving a sentence of 12 months or less will also be permitted to take part.
Russell hailed the "historic legislation", which was approved by 92 votes to 27.
READ MORE: Michael Russell: Constitutional convention plans being drawn up
To become law it had needed a "super majority" of at least 86 MSPs to vote for it – the first time this has happened at Holyrood.
The extra numbers was required because the legislation changes the electoral franchise.
Russell said voting needed to be extended to some prisoners in order for Scotland to comply with the European Court of Human Rights.
And while he accepted it was an "emotive issue" he said the changes were "driven by a compelling need to meet human rights obligations".
In contrast he said extending the vote to foreign nationals as driven by the "reality and the aspiration of modern Scottish society".
Russell told MSPs: "EU and Commonwealth citizens already have the franchise. We must also recognise the enormous contribution brought to our country from people from all over the world, that is why we are extending the right to vote in devolved elections to all foreign nationals resident in Scotland who have leave to remain."
READ MORE: Yousaf says there was 'no argument' from Gove on COP26 costs
He described this as being a "major step forward".
Green MSP Mark Ruskell had tried to amend the legislation so that asylum seekers whose case was still being considered could be given the vote - pointing out they could be "in limbo" for several years waiting for a decision.
He said: "The right to vote is seen by asylum seekers as a fundamental human right, for many it is seen as being even as important as the right to work. It is an acknowledgement of their very existence, it is an acknowledgement that they have a voice, and that they are valued.
"And they see the right to vote as a powerful invitation to integrate with the community as well. It is a recognition they are not alien, they are not others, they are part of our communities."
However, MSPs voted by 32 to 87 against the Green amendments after Russell said electoral registration officers had "practical concerns" about how to accurately maintain records of eligible asylum seekers.
Meanwhile, Conservative MSP Jamie Halcro Johnston said: "There can be little hiding from the fact that this Bill will bring prisoners into our elections, and it will be a consequence of a decision made here in Holyrood, not one of compliance with a court in Strasbourg."
READ MORE: Refugees call on MSPs to approve plans to give them vote
He added: "Many simply disagree that prisoners, people who have stepped beyond the rules set by our society, should have the right to vote for those who set those rules while they are still being punished and still have yet to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into our community."
And while he said only about 900 prisoners across Scotland would become eligible to vote, he said the SNP had "U-turned on its previous position" and "jettisoned its own principles".
Conservatives voted against the Bill, but SNP MSPs, together with Labour, the Greens and the Scottish LibDems supported it.
After the Bill was passed, Lorna Gledhill, policy officer with the Scottish Refugee Council, said: "This is a really significant moment. The right to vote is a crucial human right that everyone in Scotland should be able to enjoy.
"The decisions made by the Scottish Parliament and local councils affect everyone living in Scotland. We believe everyone living here should have a say in how the country is run."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel