A LEADING environmental scientist has hailed the "landmark decision" to refuse planning permission for the Coul Links golf course – labelling it a victory for "common sense".
Last week Scottish Ministers opted not to grant permission for the controversial plan to build an 18-hole golf course on the dune system at Coul Links, Embo, near Dornoch.
More than 30 acres of the planned development was to cover sensitive dunes at the Embo site.
The scheme had been compared to Donald Trump’s Aberdeenshire golf course, which was created on a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Under blueprints presented by US businessman Todd Warnock and backers, more than 30 acres of the planned development would have covered sensitive dunes.
It was first unveiled in December 2015 by the Highland Council, before a public inquiry into the development was launched in February 2019.
Paul Rooney, Head of Geography and Environmental Science at Liverpool Hope University, led expert evidence on behalf of Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) at the planning inquiry.
READ MORE: Coul Links: Ministers rule against plan for 18-hole golf course
And speaking after the verdict was handed down, he says the negative impacts of the proposal far outweighed the benefits.
He said: “The decision by Scottish Ministers is a landmark decision that recognises the importance of the natural environment in national planning policy.
“While the development would have resulted in limited social and economic benefits, the significant adverse environmental impacts far outweighed these benefits.
“It is a decision for common sense and one that recognises the importance of conserving our natural environment for both people and nature.”
Rooney is an international authority on the ecology and management of coastal dunes and also directs the UK Sand Dune Network based at Liverpool Hope University.
And while he’s praised the Coul Links decision, he says not all golf developments are detrimental to the environment.
On the contrary, he argues, the golf community can be important custodians of coastal dunes which ‘provide some of the finest places for the sport.’ Rev. Rooney, who’s currently working on several research projects for the Royal and Ancient, the ruling authority for golf throughout the world, adds: “In many places golf has provided a ‘full stop’ to ruinous development in the coastal dune environment.
READ MORE: Coul Links: Scottish Government rejects US plan for golf course
“There are many dune links courses in the British Isles and they play an important role in the conservation of open dynamic landscapes that are cherished by people and are important for wildlife.
“The proposal to develop a course at Coul Links did not contribute to golf’s sustainability and environmental credentials.
“Its refusal demonstrates a good decision for golf”.
SNH are the public body responsible for Scotland’s natural heritage that advises the Scottish Government and acts as a government agent in the delivery of conservation designations.
There were 18,000 objections to the plans which were submitted to the council, with a coalition of charities including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the Scottish Wildlife Trust amongst the opponents.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here