I VIVIDLY remember attending my first SNP Conference 20 years ago in Dundee. The whole conference was alive with debate, ideas and personalities, and there was some stooshie over housing policy. It was fantastic.
Like a number of people, I was hesitant about joining a political party, but was immediately reassured by the vibrancy of debate and room to contribute to those positive discussions. I felt genuinely empowered as a new member, and excited about my involvement.
One of the huge strengths of the SNP is our internal democracy. So that’s why I was surprised to read the suggestion that the party should take a “command and control” approach to the selection of our parliamentary candidates.
Our members are the beating heart of the SNP. Any member can bring forward a policy proposal through their local branch, and any member has the opportunity to take part in conference debates and stand for office bearer positions. Indeed, any member can be a prospective candidate and even run for a senior position like Depute Leader.
Our local branches are the foundation of our party democracy – they shape policy and run local campaigns, like the huge number of successful constituency campaigns for the snap Westminster election last year. They are also empowered, quite rightly, to choose their local council and parliamentary candidates. If there is more than one potential candidate nominated, then this goes to a ballot of members in the ward or constituency.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson questions Joanna Cherry's 'full-time' credentials
SNP Headquarters does not get to parachute in candidates, or instruct candidates to put themselves forward in particular seats. Potential candidates make those choices themselves.
Having a candidate who has been chosen by local members gives them a connection to their candidate, and they are therefore more likely to work to secure a win for them if they have had a say in choosing them. It’s democratic, but it’s also a key part of our successful model which has seen the SNP go from strength to strength in elections.
Internal contests in the SNP are common – from selection contests to elections for local and national office bearers. I’ve taken part in a fair few, and they have always been a fantastic good-humoured experience, based on respectful and friendly debate.
In these kind of contests, we don’t view ourselves as opponents, but as fellow candidates, each putting forward our ideas and what we consider our strengths. And that’s how it should be.
The membership surge in the SNP after the 2014 referendum did pose some logistical challenges, and has sparked a series of internal reforms to adapt to our sheer size, but also the different needs and expectations of our broader membership.
It is a fantastic strength of the SNP that we have risen to the challenge of welcoming new ideas and approaches, and that we are working together in common purpose to achieve our goal of independence.
But no matter how much we have grown as a party, our core purpose and ethos remains the same. We exist to achieve independence for Scotland, and to empower our fellow citizens to choose that future. It is only right that our own members are empowered by a party with a strong internal democracy too.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel