What We Did in the Dark
Ajay Close
Sandstone, £8.99
Catherine Carswell was a Scottish journalist, critic, biographer and novelist who lived from 1879 to 1946, closely associated with what became known as the Scottish Renaissance. Cutting her teeth as a theatre critic for the Glasgow Herald, as it then was, she blossomed into a provocative writer, receiving a bullet through the post for her biography of Robert Burns and lawyers’ letters in response to a book about her close friend D.H. Lawrence (who sought her advice when writing Sons and Lovers).
But Ajay Close’s highly engaging fictionalised memoir finds its inspiration in Carswell’s earlier life, when, after a whirlwind romance, she was trapped in a bad marriage with a man she barely knew. What We Did in the Dark is an exploration of the limits of a woman’s love with all the ingredients of a spine-chilling gothic thriller: the interior of an Edwardian asylum; Catherine’s isolation on an extended honeymoon in Italy; even an episode high in the Alps where she faces the twin hazards of a madman and a plunging ravine.
Born in Glasgow as Catherine Macfarlane, Carswell attended the Frankfurt Conservatory long enough to realise she would make only a mediocre pianist. Subsequently, she enrolled at the University of Glasgow, where she was inspired by the improbably named English Literature professor Walter Raleigh. Whether she and Raleigh were ever lovers in real life is open to question, but Close’s book opens with her visit to Raleigh and his wife in Berkshire in 1904, where a group of friends has gathered to play parlour games. The sexual tension between Catherine and her former tutor is what has lured her there, and the last thing she expects is to meet her future husband, Herbert Jackson.
Dark, moody and artistic, Herbert is just back from fighting the Boers in Transvaal, and has clearly been emotionally scarred by the experience. The horrific events he’s lived through are gradually revealed by his letters, but at this stage Catherine has no idea why he’s so suspicious and jumpy. Only after their marriage does she see the extent of his paranoid delusions, and how deeply and dangerously he’s suppressing his memories.
While what follows is a matter of public record, Close has filled in the unknowable gaps of Catherine Carswell’s life with all her skills as a novelist. Her Catherine is caught up in a maelstrom of tension, drama, forbidden passions and her idealistic refusal to give up on her marriage vows. That the whole book is addressed in the second person from Catherine to Herbert shows how unwilling she is to let him go, even as late as 1939. And Close has placed sex at the heart of the story – variously passionate, tender, adulterous and terrifying – without ever being so explicit as to trouble the Bad Sex Award shortlist. With appearances from real-life academics, painters and writers of the period, Close’s addictive, cleverly crafted novel illuminates an almost forgotten writer and the circles she moved through.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here