FORMER home secretary Amber Rudd urged Oxford University students to “stop hiding and start engaging” after she was “no-platformed” 30 minutes before she was due to speak at an event about women in politics.
Rudd was due to speak at the UN Women Oxford event for International Women’s Day, but was blocked after the student society voted to cancel it.
It followed pressure from some students who claimed Rudd’s immigration policies had marginalised minority groups, citing the Government’s treatment of the Windrush generation as an example.
Badly judged & rude of some students last night at Oxford to decide to “no platform” me 30 mins before an event I had been invited to for #IWD2020 to encourage young women into politics. They should stop hiding and start engaging. #FreeSpeech
— Amber Rudd (@AmberRuddUK) March 6, 2020
Rudd, who also served as minister for women and equalities, tweeted: “Badly judged & rude of some students last night at Oxford to decide to ‘no platform’ me 30 mins before an event I had been invited to for #IWD2020 to encourage young women into politics. They should stop hiding and start engaging.”
UN Women Oxford posted on its Facebook page: “Following a majority vote in committee, tonight’s event with speaker Amber Rudd has been cancelled.
“We are deeply sorry for all and any hurt caused to our members and other wom*n and non binary people in Oxford over this event.”
The group had invited Ms Rudd to speak about her experience of being a woman in Parliament, while also promising an “honest and frank discussion” about the impact of her policies.
Oxford University said it “strongly disapproves” of UNWomen Oxford’s actions, adding that it would be “making the University’s position and feelings very clear to the event organisers and taking necessary steps to ensure that this cannot be repeated”.
A spokesman added: “Amber Rudd had stated that she was prepared to discuss issues arising from her time in the Home Office and she should have been given the opportunity to do so.
“The University is strongly committed to freedom of speech and opposes no-platforming. We encourage our students to debate and engage with a range of views, and to treat others with the courtesy and dignity that they would expect themselves.”
A number of current and former MPs also came to Ms Rudd’s defence after the incident.
Dehenna Davison, the newly-elected Conservative MP for Bishop Auckland, tweeted: “Outrageous. Academic institutions are where you are exposed to ideas you don’t agree with, and where you can challenge them through rigorous debate.
“No platforming the former Home Secretary (and Women and Equalities Minister!) is very badly judged.”
SNP MSP for Aberdeenshire East, Gillian Martin, backed Rudd, saying: "This no platforming, cancel culture has to end."
As someone “no platformed” by my local uni students with no discussion and no right of reply last year, I stand by anyone in that position. This no platforming, cancel culture has to end. We are a democracy built on freedom of speech- why would we want to turn our backs on that? https://t.co/buCbFjgoVt
— Gillian Martin (@GillianMSP) March 6, 2020
Tory MP Dehenna Davison also backed Rudd.
Outrageous. Academic institutions are where you are exposed to ideas you don’t agree with, and where you can challenge them through rigorous debate.
— Dehenna Davison MP (@DehennaDavison) March 6, 2020
No platforming the former Home Secretary (and Women and Equalities Minister!) is very badly judged. https://t.co/z3JmBh7q5o
Former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson posted: “If you’re trying to silence Amber Rudd you really are being anti-democratic.”
If you’re trying to silence Amber Rudd you really are being anti-democratic. https://t.co/ZYvGZrSt6q
— Tom Watson (@tom_watson) March 6, 2020
And former Conservative and Liberal Democrat MP Dr Sarah Wollaston tweeted: “No platforming of @AmberRuddUK by Oxford is absurd & worrying. Why are universities allowing ideological fringes to crush freedom of speech in our centres of excellence?”
No platforming of @AmberRuddUK by Oxford is absurd & worrying . Why are universities allowing idealogical fringes to crush freedom of speech in our centres of excellence ? https://t.co/hT0peYZq5u
— dr Sarah Wollaston (@sarahwollaston) March 6, 2020
The University of Oxford and UN Women Oxford have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel