SCOTTISH Green Party MSP Andy Wightman has successfully defended himself against defamation action over blog posts he published about Wildcat Haven Enterprises (WHE).
The blog posts, published in September 2015 and February 2016, led to WHE attempting in 2017 to claim £750,000 in damages against the MSP which would likely have cost him his seat in the Scottish Parliament.
In their ruling, Lord Clarke found that the author did not defame WHE, nor that his posts had resulted in a loss of £750,000 to organisation.
Today, Wightman has announced that he is "delighted" with the judgement, and thanked his legal team for their work.
I am delighted that Lord Clarke has ruled that I did not defame Wildcat Haven Enterprises CIC, that they did not prove a loss of £750,000, that the pursuers allegations fail on grounds either of establishing the alleged meaning OR are covered by fair comment. 1/4 pic.twitter.com/Q3XhvuXnz0
— Andy Wightman MSP (@andywightman) March 11, 2020
He said: "I'm delighted with this judgement from Lord Clark. I would like to thank my legal team of Campbell Deane and Roddy Dunlop QC for their support, diligence and hard work over the past three years. I’d also like to thank my family and colleagues at work for their support and understanding over this period.
"I want to pay particular thanks to the thousands of people who generously contributed to my crowdfunder, without whom I would simply have been unable to defend myself. I have been hugely encouraged by their ongoing support.
"The National Union of Journalists and Scottish PEN have also been very supportive as part of their wider campaign for defamation reform. I have maintained throughout that I did not defame the pursuer and that this action should never have been brought against me.
"It is vital that Parliament modernises the law of defamation to ensure that the law provides the right balance between freedom of expression and the rights of people not to have their reputations tarnished. It is also important that the law is clear, so that writers and journalists can write confidently and provide the freedom of expression that is so important in any democracy."
The Lothian MSP and writer raised over £116,000 from crowdfunding to take on the case against him. He said at the time that a "huge worry" had been lifted after hitting his funding target.
Wightman promised to repay contributions should he win the case and be awarded costs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel