BORIS Johnson is poised to announce a feasibility study into a new road crossing between Scotland and Northern Ireland, according to his Scottish Secretary.
Alister Jack said the UK should be “ambitious” in its approach to new infrastructure, claiming the country is “lagging behind” other nations.
Asked why there had been no money for the project in Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget, Jack said: “Watch this space.”
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, he said: “The Prime Minister I expect will announce a feasibility study into the link to Northern Ireland, I hope the Scottish Government will back it.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's government urged to ditch Scotland-NI tunnel plan
Johnson has repeatedly spoken about the prospect of a bridge linking the south of Scotland with Northern Ireland – although Jack suggested it could instead be a tunnel or a combination of the two.
He said: “I think we should be ambitious. If we think about HS2, from London Euston to Birmingham Airport on HS2 will take only 38 minutes, there is huge improvements in transport infrastructure around the world.
“We are lagging behind in this country and we believe we should look at all options.”
Experts have warned the depth of the Irish Sea and the presence of dumped munitions would cause problems for any crossing.
The project could cost a reported £20 billion, although Johnson has previously said it would “only cost about £15bn”.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson: Tunnel nonsense means Tories can look forward to losses in 2021
The Scottish Government has insisted better uses could be found for the funds - with Transport Secretary Michael Matheson making this point in a recent letter to his UK counterpart Grant Shapps.
Meanwhile, economic experts at the Fraser of Allander Institute said a new crossing would neither boost the economy nor improve connectivity.
In a damning assessment of the proposal, it stated: “In short, it won’t deliver the economic boost some claim, it isn’t a priority, it would go to the wrong location, it wouldn’t be consistent with climate change objectives and the money could be better spent on other things.
“Apart from that, it’s a cracking idea.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel