Reaction from the Alex Salmond trial has exposed barriers to making allegations of sexual assault and could have a "chilling effect" on future reporting, according to a charity.
The former First Minister of Scotland was cleared of 13 charges at the High Court in Edinburgh on Monday.
Rape Crisis Scotland has now claimed coverage of the trial and accusations against those making complaints could dissuade those who may wish to come forward with allegations in future.
Sandy Brindley, chief executive of the charity, said: "The trial of Alex Salmond has exposed the barriers that exist to reporting sexual crimes and we fear could have a chilling effect on reporting for years to come.
"The significance of this trial goes far beyond Salmond and the women involved in this case.
"Much of what happened in this trial is replicated across Scotland, compounding the fears of survivors.
"How we respond sends a signal to anyone who might one day try to report a sexual offence."
She added: "In seeking vengeance against these women, those commenting on this case should reflect on the message that they are sending to all those who have experienced sexual crimes, and those who one day will.
READ MORE: Philippa Whitford calls for SNP role for Alex Salmond
"From the volume and nature of recent calls to our helpline we know that when there are public conversations about sexual assault survivors are listening.
"If we ever hope to move beyond rape and attempted rape having the lowest conviction rate of any crime, then we should be careful of the messages we are sending."
Salmond vowed evidence of a plot to discredit him will "see the light of day" after he was acquitted of a string of sexual offences, including attempted rape.
He had denied all the charges and giving evidence claimed some were "deliberate fabrications for a political purpose".
READ MORE: Alex Salmond Trial: Timeline of events up to today's verdict
Shortly after the verdict was announced, Joanna Cherry SNP MP said she was "pleased" with the outcome and that press reporting should be done "carefully".
She also called for an independent inquiry into how her party handled the complaints.
The jury, which took less than six hours to reach its decision, returned not guilty verdicts on 12 charges and returned a not proven verdict on a charge of sexual assault with intent to rape.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article