THE technology has been in use for more than a century, but now a Scots health campaigner has said urgent research is needed into the use of ionisers, which could be key to helping alleviate the current Covid-19 pandemic.
And physicist and engineer Pete Gavin – who helped force a health board U-turn on the Heartbeat Centre in Inverness two years ago – said previously published research should be immediately reviewed to see how the non-chemical and non-biological method could help halt the outbreak and prevent even more deaths.
In their simplest form, ionisers release negative ions into the air which then latch on to positive ions, such as dust, pollen, and importantly, bacteria and viruses. These bonded molecules are heavier and fall to the ground or on to surfaces such as tabletops. The air is thus cleaned, although the surfaces the molecules have settled on will have to be properly disinfected manually.
Gavin told The National: “This is proven direct electronic air sanitation – not biological or chemical – that works before the personal protective equipment (PPE) barrier.
“A two-year trial reported in 2003 greater than 97% efficacy, as did a 2015 viral trial in a lab, and there were reports last month that Swedish research had now been extended to cover coronavirus.
“We urgently need to drive Government to review the key scientific papers.
“A hospital ward can be kitted out within two weeks for less than the price of a coffin.”
READ MORE: Coronavirus: SEC field hospital to be named after WWI nurse
The 2003 trial at St James Hospital in Leeds found that infections of the bacteria acinetobacter in an intensive care ward were eliminated by the negative air ioniser.
During a year-long trial, the infection rate fell to zero. University of Leeds engineer, Clive Begg, told New Scientist: “We were absolutely astounded to find such clear cut results.
“We don’t fully understand how it is working, but we suspect it is damaging or killing the bacteria.
“But if the ionisers are cleaning the air in this way, we would expect to find more precipitation of acinetobacter on surfaces and this is exactly what we found.”
St James’s Hospital consultant Stephen Dean told the magazine: “The results have been fantastic – so much so that we have asked the university to leave the ionisers with us.”
WATCH: BBC presenter stumped by UK's '30 ventilators' claim
Another team member, clinical microbiologist Kevin Kerr, added: “Ionisers may become a powerful weapon in the fight against hospital-acquired infection.”
The 2015 study by a team of Swedish academics used a portable ionising device to achieve 100% prevention of airborne transmitted influenza “A” between animals and a 97% inactivation of the virus. They concluded: “Most interesting and of great clinical significance of this study was the novel finding that the ionising device could detect and prevent influenza virus infection in a controlled setting, mimicking ‘authentic’ conditions”.
Highlands and Islands Labour MSP David Stewart, shadow public health minister, said he was impressed with the potential for Gavin’s “innovative” approach and had been in touch with Health Secretary Jeane Freeman. A Scottish Government spokesperson would not comment “as any use of the ionisers would surely be a clinical decision, not one for ministers”.
Scientists in India, meanwhile, have wasted no time trying to work out how the findings translate into weapons to fight Covid-19.
A start-up in the tech hub of Pune was awarded a 10 million rupee (£105,000) grant to develop its Scitech Airon, of which the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said “helps to control the virus … could clean up the air and disinfect areas exposed to the infection through Covid-19 positive cases”.
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel