A SCOTS MP has called for a radical overhaul of “our broken asylum accommodation system” after the UK’s highest court gave the green light to lock-change evictions – which do not necessitate a court order – of refugees in Glasgow.
The Supreme Court refused Kurdish-Iraqi asylum seeker Shakar Ali permission to appeal in her case against Serco Group, which had provided housing for refugees until it lost the Home Office contract early last year.
It said Ali’s application did not raise an arguable point of law and its decision marks the end of her appeal route.
Serco had put other eviction cases on hold pending the outcome of this appeal.
READ MORE: SNP MP urges Home Office to scrap 'immoral' refugee legislation
Stuart McDonald, shadow SNP spokesperson on immigration, asylum and border control, told The National: “The decision by the Supreme Court not to hear an appeal is hugely disappointing.
“There may or may not be other legal routes for challenging lock-change evictions.
“But that shouldn’t be required – it is the responsibility of the Home Office to radically overhaul our broken asylum accommodation system.”
McDonald added: “Ensuring proper oversight by the courts of any eviction proceedings would be just the first step in that process of restoring accountability of private companies operating the accommodation – but a very necessary first step, making sure vulnerable people are not left destitute, homeless and without any means of support.”
Govan Law Centre (GLC), which had helped Ali bring the case, said last month that it had secured a further three-month stay for other refugees who were affected by the pending evictions.
There are thought to be around 150 asylum seekers involved and the centre said it would now consider what further steps, if any, it could take.
Mike Dailly, solicitor advocate for the GLC, said: “We are deeply disappointed with this decision, but our immediate concern is for the health, safety and well-being of our clients and everyone in Serco accommodation in Glasgow during the Covid-19 crisis.
“We hope Serco will act responsibly and in the wider public interest in the present circumstances.
“I wouldn’t like to think they would throw people out onto the streets in the middle of a pandemic.”
Robina Qureshi, director of Positive Action in Housing, which helps refugees with accommodation, said: “At a time when every government, housing and financial institution is working to ensure people do not get put out of their homes, it is
deeply disappointing that Serco has now been given carte blanche by the UK Supreme Court to evict refused refugees from housing in Glasgow.
“We hope that Serco will not act out lock change evictions at this time of emergency when more vulnerable people are at increased risk of homelessness.”
In a statement, Jenni Halliday, Serco contract director for asylum accommodation and support services, told The National: “We are pleased that the Scottish Supreme Court has refused this leave to appeal and that our legal position has once again been confirmed.
“Serco has ceased repossession activity some weeks ago as a result of the Covid-19 situation.”
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel