RESIDENTS of Scotland’s highest village have a “clear vision” of the future as their buyout bid from one of the country’s biggest landowners moves forward.
Around 200 people live 467metres up in Wanlockhead, a former mining village currently owned by the Duke of Buccleuch.
Residents hope to purchase more than 3860 acres of what is now part of Buccleuch’s Queensberry Estate.
Now a feasibility study and business plan from the Wanlockhead Community Trust (WCT) reveals what the future could look like in the area, which lies one mile from Dumfries and Galloway’s boundary with South Lanarkshire.
It shows how the community could change and develop over the next few years once the buyout is complete – something that could happen within months.
The newly published plan proposes new campsites and festivals to develop the economy plus continued gold panning as well as increased tree planting and other measures to care for the land.
The Wanlockhead Inn, which is Scotland’s highest pub, already runs the increasingly three-day heavy metal Wildfire Music Festival, but it’s hoped that community ownership could provide villagers with opportunities focused around heritage tourism, cycling and mountain biking and the arts.
Part of the area is also said to be ideal for “voluntourism”, in which visitors interested in “wildlife, nature, reforestation, countryside access and environmental management” get involved in local projects.
The document states that attracting higher visitor numbers is crucial to a sustainable future. Experts say a dedicated development officer will be needed for at least three years, with costs reaching £40,000 a year. It says: “The land asset has existing income streams from a number of sources, including gold panning, rental from one house and from wayleaves and licenses.
“These are not sufficient to support a development officer to help access and deliver development funding and projects. The trust’s focus must therefore be on developing and growing the visitor economy to support other ongoing efforts, bringing employment and jobs into the area and securing those that are
already there.”
The 40-member WCT had initially aimed to purchase as much as 14,000 acres of land from Buccleuch. This was revised after lengthy talks involving the Scottish Land Commission and Scottish Land and Estates, which represents landowners.
An agreement in principle has now been reached and it is hoped that a final deal will be struck later this year.
Lincoln Richford, WCT chair, said: “This feasibility study represents many years of work as well as Wanlockhead’s highest aspirations regarding land ownership and land use.
“We believe it offers a clear vision and pathway for our community to develop a successful and sustainable future.”
The report – paid for by the Scottish Land Fund in partnership with the National Lottery Community Fund and Highlands and Islands Enterprise – was prepared by Edinburgh consultants Urban Animation.
Director Richard Heggie said: “Community land ownership has proven to be a successful route towards resilience and sustainability for places across Scotland. Wanlockhead now has the opportunity to join these communities in taking control of its land and its future.
“We wish the people of Wanlockhead every success in their exciting and transformational venture.”
Funding for the buyout will likely be provided by the Scottish Land Fund and other backers after the village holds a future formal vote endorsing it.
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: http://www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel