A VIRAL Twitter thread claiming the UK Government has links to fake NHS staff Twitter accounts has been called into question after the Department of Health and the social media giant denied the allegations.
The thread, which amassed more than 25,000 retweets and was shared by high-profile Twitter users, alleged the Department of Health has been running a network of fake NHS employee accounts to support the UK Government’s coronavirus response.
The tweets were composed by John O’Connell, whose bio states he is a journalist and founder and editor at FRW Anti-Racism Group.
He claimed there were 128 accounts registered to one person with four assigned contributors – and theorised they had been set up by the Department for Health and Social Care of a market agency linked to them.
READ MORE: Fury at Douglas Lumsden's 'Better Together' tweet after oil crash
The accounts, including "NHS Susan" which he highlighted at the beginning of the thread, have since been deleted.
The "NHS Susan" in question had been wearing a badge with the name "Mia" on - and West Herts NHS, where it appears the woman in the photograph works, confirmed the account did not belong to her. They wrote on Twitter: "We reported this fake account to twitter as soon as we were made aware of it. It has now been shut down."
We reported this fake account to twitter as soon as we were made aware of it. It has now been shut down.
— West Herts Hospitals (@WestHertsNHS) April 20, 2020
While O'Connell did not report how he had come to the conclusion that the Department of Health was responsible for the posts, or the name of the marketing agency allegedly involved, he wrote on Twitter this morning: "Update on the Fake Nurses Accounts: We’re analysing the data and seeking a way of presenting it while protecting ourselves from legal issues. We know what happened to those that blew the whistle on Cambridge Analytica. More to come."
Initially, a Department of Health spokesperson said: “These claims are categorically false.
“To share disinformation of this kind undermines the national effort against coronavirus.”
Twitter was also asked whether there was evidence of such a scheme taking place. The social media giant told the Financial Times they could not see evidence of such a “large-scale co-ordinated platform manipulation surrounding the Covid-19 conversation, including suggested co-ordination associated with the UK Government”.
They added that they would remove smaller co-ordinated efforts to distort the conversation around the pandemic and would “remain vigilant” against misinformation on the platform.
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: http://www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel