A TOP mandarin has backtracked on claims that it was a political decision by the UK Government not to take part in an EU procurement scheme for supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Sir Simon McDonald, the Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, had made the remark as he gave evidence to a Commons committee.
Asked why Boris Johnson’s Government did not take part in the initiative which the UK was invited to participate in despite no longer being a member, McDonald said: “It was a political decision. The mission briefed ministers about what was available, what was on offer, and the decision is known.”
But last night, he said in a letter to MP Tom Tugendhat that “due to a misunderstanding, I inadvertently and wrongly told the committee that ministers were briefed” and insisted that a political decision on whether or not to participate was not taken.
The U-turn is just one of many twists and turns in stories on the procurement scheme.
READ MORE: Matt Hancock denies failure to join EU scheme was political move
Last week it emerged that the UK Government missed three chances to sign up to the EU scheme and was also absent from key talks about future purchases, choosing to make its own arrangements, despite the EU invites.
As a result of the EU scheme, European doctors and nurses have received the first of £1.3 billion worth of personal protective equipment through the joint procurement scheme involving 25 countries and eight companies.
A European Commission spokesman last week said that medical equipment, including masks, overalls and goggles, is now in excess of the number requested.
Meanwhile, the UK and Scotland have been struggling to get enough supplies, with some health and care workers forced to reuse gear designed for a single use.
The UK Government had previously said it was unable to join the EU’s procurement schemes as it had not received an email of invitation. It also missed out on mass procurement of medical ventilators by the EU after failing to take part in the parallel procurement scheme. It blamed emails from the EU being sent to an out of date email address.
Responding to McDonald’s original remarks, the SNP’s Alyn Smith had described the comments as “damning”.
“That this was a ‘political decision’ by the UK Government, rather than a logistical error, that prevented the UK from securing vital PPE supplies for our frontline staff tackling the coronavirus pandemic is damning,” said Smith.
“UK Government ministers were briefed about the Europe-wide scheme but chose to reject vital protective equipment due to its narrow Brexit ideology.
“It would be unacceptable if anyone has decided to put politics before the urgent need to save people’s lives.
He added: “Governments across the UK have a duty to work together and with international partners to tackle the pandemic effectively. The UK Government must now urgently explain why it took a political decision to reject vital PPE supplies.”
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel