SCOTTISH Labour leader Richard Leonard has said he is “strongly of the view” that the UK must follow a common approach to leaving the coronavirus lockdown.
Scotland’s national clinical director Jason Leitch had recently suggested at separate exit strategies, while Imperial College’s Neil Ferguson had recently hinted that lockdown measures could be eased based on people’s ages and geographical locations.
However Leonard told the BBC there needs to be a “cross-border” approach when the time does come.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said later this week she will lay out criteria which must be met for Covid-19 restrictions to be lifted.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Scotland may take different approach to UK on lockdown call
While some Cabinet ministers have hinted they favour easing constraints from next month, Sturgeon has indicated she is more cautious and does not see the economy and health as trade offs.
But Leonard questioned how “different rules” for easing the lockdown would affect border areas and said he rejects an early end to current restrictions.
The MSP said: “Party leaders last week asked the First Minister if we could get access to officials in the Scottish Government who are working on the exit strategy, and so far that hasn’t happened.”
“We don’t expect a detailed timetable because, to some extent, we are in uncharted territory, but we do expect cross-party agreement on the principles that will guide the exit strategy.”
He went on: “We are strongly of the view that there needs to be a cross-border approach.
"The national clinical director said recently that Orkney is not the same as Oxford street, but that raises considerations about what the implication of a differentiated approach would be to the south of Scotland, to the border communities, if there were different rules on lockdown operating in Dumfries and Galloway compared to Cumbria.”
The national clinical director had suggested restrictions could be eased differently across the UK, saying: “Orkney looks quite different from Oxford Street. It’s important to do what applies in your context.”
Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. It’s no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just £2 for 2 months by following this link: www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks – and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel