THE UK Government is facing calls for greater transparency over the scientific advice given to ministers on the coronavirus outbreak.
Downing Street angrily dismissed claims the advice could be politicised following the disclosure Boris Johnson's top aide Dominic Cummings had been attending meetings of a key scientific group.
Opposition parties, however, said political advisers had no business attending the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) and called for its deliberations to be opened to wider scrutiny.
The row comes as the coronavirus lockdown enters its fifth weekend, with fears that the expected warm weather for much of the country may see people ignoring social distancing rules.
The controversy over Sage - which will advise ministers on the lifting of the restrictions - came after The Guardian reported that Cummings and Ben Warner, a data scientist who worked with him on the Vote Leave campaign in the Brexit referendum, had been present at Sage meetings.
READ MORE: Matt Hancock under pressure to copy Scotland's lockdown exit plan
Downing Street denied they were members of the group and said they were simply seeking to better understand the science involved and how it could inform government decision-making.
"Sage provides independent scientific advice to the government. Political advisers have no role in this," a No 10 spokesman said.
"The scientists on Sage are among the most eminent in their fields. It is factually wrong and damaging to sensible public debate to imply their advice is affected by government advisers listening to discussions.
"Public confidence in the media has collapsed during this emergency partly because of ludicrous stories such as this."
However, shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said the disclosure raised "significant questions" about the credibility of Government decision-making.
"Dominic Cummings has no place on the Government's scientific advisory group on the coronavirus," he said.
"He is a political adviser, not a medical or scientific expert. If the public are to have confidence in the Sage, the Government must make clear Dominic Cummings can no longer participate or attend.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon pleads with Scots to stay at home as weather improves
"We also need full transparency on who is attending meeting of Sage what is being discussed."
Meanwhile, it has emerged that Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden has been in talks with the governing bodies of a number of major sports, with football expected to be the first to get the green light to resume matches behind closed door.
It is understood that detailed discussions have been taking place with medical officials from Public Health England on the criteria that would have to be met for games to go ahead.
A Government spokesman said: "Ministers continue to work with sports governing bodies on how live sporting events can resume in the future.
"This can only happen once we have passed the five tests for easing social distancing measures."
In other developments, the NHS is to launch a new campaign urging people to seek urgent care if they suffer a medical emergency after visits to A&E dropped by almost 50%.
READ MORE: Scottish Brexit Secretary hasn't heard anything from Westminster in six weeks
Health officials are worried many people are not seeking treatment because they fear contracting Covid-19 in hospital, jeopardising their survival and potentially becoming collateral damage to the virus.
The Government has also given the go-ahead for a clinical trial to establish if plasma from the blood of recovered coronavirus patients could help treat others fighting the illness.
The treatment would involve the "convalescent plasma", donated from the blood of people who have recovered from the virus, being transfused to patients who are struggling to produce their own antibodies against the illness.
Convalescent plasma was used as a treatment during the Sars outbreak.
Thousands of people are also expected to try to book a coronavirus test on the Government's new website again on Saturday, after tests ran out soon after it went live on Friday.
Some 46,000 people tried to book a test, with more than 10 million key workers and their households now eligible for one as the Government races to hit its 100,000-a-day testing target by next Thursday.
READ MORE: UK 'on crash course with Google' over coronavirus tracking app
Under the expansion, NHS and social care staff, police officers, teachers, social workers, undertakers, journalists and those who work in supermarkets and food production are among those now eligible.
But within two minutes of the website going live at 6am on Friday, all 5,000 tests for people to do at home had been booked, while more than 15,000 appointments for tests at drive-through centres were also taken quickly.
The Department of Health said a total of 19,506 patients had died in hospital after testing positive for coronavirus in the UK as of 5pm on Thursday, up by 768 from 18,738 the day before.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel